QUESTION
Why are NYC's revenue forecasts conservative? Isn't there a concern that an overly conservative revenue estimate will lead to unnecessary service reductions?
0:49:11
·
4 min
Budget Director Jacques Jiha explains that NYC's conservative revenue forecasting is crucial to avoid mistakes that could necessitate service cuts.
- NYC's budget management prioritizes conservative revenue forecasting to prevent overspending and subsequent service reductions.
- Jiha emphasizes the severe consequences of overestimating revenue, highlighting the importance of caution in budget planning.
- Despite recent economic strength, the city's approach remains cautious, with forecasts being adjusted based on economic performance.
- The Budget Director reassures that adjustments to the executive budget will reflect the ongoing economic conditions, ensuring responsiveness to economic changes.
- The dialogue underscores a shared responsibility to secure the city's financial stability through prudent forecasting and budget management.
Justin L. Brannan
0:49:11
They both mentioned that the city the city's revenue forecasts are generally conservative.
0:49:17
Obviously, I understand the rationale for approaching revenue forecast conservatively in periods of growth to ensure we don't overspend.
0:49:24
But I guess, Is there not a concern that an overly conservative revenue estimate will lead to unnecessary service reductions?
Jacques Jiha
0:49:34
No.
0:49:36
The challenge that you have is, as I we say, to folks all the time.
0:49:41
Or we cannot afford to make a mistake when it comes to revenue forecast.
0:49:45
Because if we overstate our forecast and we spend the resources, we have to cut.
0:49:53
Okay?
0:49:54
So it's not like we say, you know, at, hey, we overstep our forecast and the other ramifications to it.
0:50:00
So therefore, we would have had a buildup rather than basically cut.
0:50:04
People think we take pleasure, okay, in coding services or coding programs.
0:50:10
Not at all.
0:50:11
Okay?
0:50:12
We all come to government, okay, to basically make a difference.
0:50:17
Okay?
0:50:18
So we don't think so.
0:50:19
We have to be extremely conservative because there are ramifications to what we do.
0:50:24
So overstating forecast spend the resources and then upstream the mistake, and then you have to cut back reverse.
0:50:35
It's a lot worse.
0:50:36
Okay?
0:50:37
Then basically say, you know what?
0:50:38
I'm conservative.
0:50:40
I'm gonna try to manage my budget as conservative as I can.
0:50:43
If Okay?
0:50:45
We are successful in terms of managing our budget.
0:50:48
And if we are successful by the economy, okay, is growing, continue to grow.
0:50:54
Okay.
0:50:55
It's icing on the cake.
0:50:56
We could add things on top of where we are because at that time, we know we have those resources.
0:51:01
But if we don't have those resources, I'm hoping that you're right.
0:51:04
I'm hoping that your your forecast is right because you could be it's a forecast.
0:51:10
You could be white or you could be wrong.
0:51:12
Okay?
0:51:13
I'm hoping that you're right.
0:51:14
Okay?
0:51:15
But this is a forecast.
0:51:17
So and we making decisions.
0:51:19
Okay?
0:51:20
That are weird.
0:51:21
Okay?
0:51:22
That are baseline on a forecast that can be wait or long.
0:51:27
So if you're gonna make a long term decision on a forecast, you better off being conservative to know that the revenue is gonna be there to support the program going forward.
Justin L. Brannan
0:51:39
Okay.
0:51:41
But when you said that the council was being too liberal, and then your forecast was actually higher than ours.
0:51:47
Is that just because you were working on outdated information?
Jacques Jiha
0:51:50
No.
0:51:50
What happened is, everybody knows, everybody was surprised to see us strong the economy was in the latter part of 2023.
0:51:57
Everyone.
0:51:58
Okay.
0:51:59
Everyone on the Wall Street, everyone.
0:52:01
Okay.
0:52:01
Everyone was looking for a soft lending of the economy recession, mostly last year.
0:52:07
And we ended up with a soft lending.
0:52:09
Better I'm not even a softening.
0:52:10
Something better than a softening.
0:52:12
Okay?
0:52:13
So and as a result, we had to revise up with our forecast.
0:52:19
Okay?
0:52:20
And but your forecast also assume a slowdown of the economy.
0:52:24
So it's not like just us assuming the slowdown of the economy.
0:52:26
We all assume a slowdown of the economy.
0:52:28
The difference you're talking about, it's a $1,000,000,000 here and there.
0:52:32
Okay?
0:52:32
In the scope of things, a $100,000,000,000 economy okay, a forecast of it's just very small portion.
0:52:38
It's very small piece.
0:52:40
So again, as I said, you are always better off when conservative because you are making long term decisions.
0:52:49
Okay?
0:52:50
Alright.
0:52:50
Based on the forecast, So you better off, okay, been very conservative.
0:52:55
And if, okay, the economy is stronger than you anticipate, it's acting okay.
Justin L. Brannan
0:53:02
So what extent do you think your current forecast with this continued strength that we're talking about, can we expect to see an adjustment in the executive budget?
Jacques Jiha
0:53:15
We will review as we always do our forecast in the executive budget.
0:53:20
Okay.
0:53:20
And when we will sit, we'll see where we, you know, we'll see where we are.
0:53:25
Whether or not we are more conservative than you or whether or not we're in line with your forecast at this point in time.
0:53:33
I cannot tell you because we already revised up our forecast base, okay, on the stronger than its ability to come.
0:53:41
That we had at the end of fiscal at the end of 2023.
0:53:46
Okay.
0:53:46
So if the economy remains strong, Okay?
0:53:49
It would be reflected in our forecast.
0:53:52
If it weakens, it also will be reflected in our forecast.
← Previous Chapter
What is the plan to transition Humanitarian Emergency Response and Relief Centers (HERRCs) operated by Health and Hospitals (H and H) to the Department of Homeless Services (DHS) to reduce costs?
Next Chapter →
What is the amount of new state asylum seeker funding in the governor's budget?