The citymeetings.nyc logo showing a pigeon at a podium with a microphone.

citymeetings.nyc

Your guide to NYC's public proceedings.

QUESTION

Why are funds being cut from alternative to incarceration programs, leading to increased expenditure on youth incarceration?

1:18:24

·

5 min

Council Member Lincoln Restler questions Commissioner Juanita Holmes about budget cuts to alternative to incarceration programs and the subsequent increase in youth incarceration costs.

  • Council Member Restler raises concerns about significant budget cuts to alternative to incarceration programs under Commissioner Holmes's tenure at the Department of Probation.
  • Despite these cuts, there's a 50% increase in spending on youth incarceration, amounting to an additional $20 million.
  • Holmes confirms the cuts to specific programs and provides vague reasons for them, mentioning lack of attendance and compliance as issues.
  • Restler criticizes the decision to cut effective diversion programs given the rising youth incarceration rates, stressing the negative impact on young people in New York City.
Lincoln Restler
1:18:24
So Since you've come into office and brought in a new leadership team at the Department of Probation, and I I just have to say I had a great working relationship with multiple commissioners over multiple administrations and the senior leadership team at DLP was reform oriented and thoughtful.
1:18:40
I'm very concerned about the change in trajectory that we're seeing under your leadership at the Department of Probation.
1:18:46
We've seen cuts of $700,000 to the impact program, $2,600,000 to next step, $1,600,000 Arches nearly $5,000,000 in cuts to alternative joint incarceration programs under your tenure.
1:18:58
Is that correct?
Juanita Holmes
1:19:00
Sounds about right.
Lincoln Restler
1:19:02
Do you know how much we're spending on increased incarceration of kids in jail in our youth detention secured detention facilities?
1:19:10
No.
1:19:11
It's increased by $20,000,000, a 50% increase from FY 19 to the present.
1:19:18
So over these years, we've seen spending increase by 50% in our jails by $20,000,000 while we've cut by $5,000,000 the programs that serve to keep people out of jail that are effective alternative to incarceration programs.
1:19:31
You said there's no data for the next steps.
Juanita Holmes
1:19:33
Not next steps.
1:19:34
Next steps
Lincoln Restler
1:19:35
There was you said there was no data.
1:19:36
Is that right?
Juanita Holmes
1:19:37
Next steps next steps program was community oriented.
1:19:42
Impact program was never off the ground and running.
1:19:46
So it served it started But when it wasn't for youth, you're you're mentioning juveniles.
1:19:52
Right?
1:19:52
The increase.
1:19:53
That program was not for young people.
1:19:55
The impact would
Lincoln Restler
1:19:56
have wrote up served a 175 young people.
Juanita Holmes
1:19:58
What?
1:19:58
That wasn't for young people.
Lincoln Restler
1:20:00
Implant program would have served a 175 young people.
1:20:02
Are you saying that's not accurate?
Juanita Holmes
1:20:03
Was it for young people?
1:20:04
Yes.
Gale A. Brewer
1:20:05
I thought it was
Lincoln Restler
1:20:05
Of course, it's for young people.
1:20:07
For young people, please put somebody clarified.
Althea Stevens
1:20:09
Who's for young people?
Lincoln Restler
1:20:10
We all know this.
1:20:11
Mhmm.
1:20:11
Come on.
1:20:13
Sorry.
1:20:13
I get too upset.
Juanita Holmes
1:20:14
Well, you're you're you're we'd all do back council, you're saying a 175 young people.
1:20:20
The program was not running, and they and what was stated to me right, coming in the door.
1:20:26
I met what what to throw in at me.
1:20:27
Right?
1:20:28
What was stated to me by, I believe, the former deputy commissioner of administration was that the providers was delaying the start of the program.
Lincoln Restler
1:20:37
I've spoken with cases.
1:20:39
Cases was selected as the provider through your RP process.
1:20:41
Is that correct?
Juanita Holmes
1:20:42
I don't know.
1:20:43
I wasn't Could
Lincoln Restler
1:20:43
somebody testify?
1:20:44
Yes.
Juanita Holmes
1:20:45
It was just cases.
Lincoln Restler
1:20:46
Cases was provide was selected.
1:20:47
They were selected to provide a contract for a 175 at risk young people that would have other that were in family quarters.
1:20:52
Correct.
1:20:54
Just yes or no's, please.
1:20:55
This is the most basic stuff for programs that you all cut.
1:20:58
You should know better.
1:20:59
What what It
Juanita Holmes
1:20:59
was correct.
Lincoln Restler
1:21:00
Okay.
1:21:01
So I'll take a yes on that one.
1:21:03
Cases was ready to provide the services.
1:21:05
They have test they have shared that with my office, with council member Steven's office.
1:21:08
I'm sure with council member nurses off with chair nurses off this.
1:21:11
Mhmm.
1:21:12
Why was the program cut?
1:21:13
A program that was was when youth incarceration rates are skyrocketing.
1:21:17
Why would we eliminate one of the most effective diversion programs in the city of New York.
Juanita Holmes
1:21:21
The program was cut because we were informed that they already had an existing impact program and that one didn't get up and running.
Lincoln Restler
1:21:29
There is no alternative to the impact program.
1:21:31
There is nothing like impact that operates in the city.
Juanita Holmes
1:21:33
I don't want.
1:21:34
I mean, I I just I I don't I disagree.
LuAnne Klauber
1:21:36
Well, you just you said there's
Lincoln Restler
1:21:37
an alternative.
1:21:38
So let's hear from your deputy commissioners.
1:21:40
Was there an alternative?
1:21:41
What other services are being provided to these young cases?
1:21:43
If all you were doing is sending them to jail, No.
1:21:46
That is the only policy that we are seeing.
1:21:48
That is the outcome we are seeing.
1:21:49
The services are being cut and you're sending more kids to jail.
1:21:52
That is what tell me.
1:21:53
I mean, the alternatives that are being provided.
Juanita Holmes
1:21:55
I beg the different counsel.
Lincoln Restler
1:21:56
You said that the alternative to next steps was archers.
1:21:59
You cut $2,600,000.
1:22:01
You testified back to that an hour ago.
1:22:03
The the you cut I'm listening.
1:22:05
And I'm listening to your testimony
Alex Stein
1:22:06
in the Here's in the accuracy of it.
Sandy Nurse
1:22:08
Let her speak.
Juanita Holmes
1:22:09
Here's what I testified to.
1:22:10
When I walked in the door, I was told Archis was 5 days, scaled down to 3 days.
1:22:15
I said, why?
1:22:17
Because young people weren't compliant with attendance.
1:22:21
I said, why?
1:22:22
I have to come up with something that's going to bring them in the door.
1:22:26
Do you think I'm intentionally cutting programs while still creating programs while still being concerned.
1:22:31
I walked in the door and no one ever had a meeting with DOE about kids coming to us undercredited, no education.
1:22:38
Not going to school, not listening to their parents.
Lincoln Restler
1:22:41
I just
Juanita Holmes
1:22:41
I put that in place.
Lincoln Restler
1:22:43
Right?
1:22:43
I just focus on the questions.
Juanita Holmes
1:22:44
A program a program is important.
1:22:47
School is ten times more important, but we are definitely putting programs more programs, the right programs in place.
1:22:56
Okay.
1:22:56
That's what we want for young.
Lincoln Restler
1:22:57
You testified that you were cutting next steps because it didn't have data.
1:23:00
Former DOP staff
Juanita Holmes
1:23:01
reached out to my office.
1:23:02
Said it didn't have the outcomes.
1:23:05
THERE WAS No SUSEMSA OUTCOMES OTHER THAN METRICS, OTHER THAN 60 PEOPLE ATTENDING.
Lincoln Restler
1:23:10
Reporter: IF IT WOULD BE HELPFUL, FORMER THOSE 60 PEOPLE
Juanita Holmes
1:23:13
weren't the 16 people.
1:23:15
So when I say 16 people attending, that means 16 names touched it.
1:23:19
The names might have changed.
1:23:20
They didn't.
Lincoln Restler
1:23:21
I have witnessed this program up close I met with these providers.
1:23:23
This is a highly effective program serving at risk, nitrile youth.
1:23:26
Former view of these apps has sent
Althea Stevens
1:23:28
tons of Demetrics grant outcomes.
Lincoln Restler
1:23:30
That are but you cut $2,600,000 in funding that were serving these aggregates in our nitrogen dominance.
1:23:35
And then you testified today that that program was folded in that you were serving them through arches.
1:23:40
But you cut Arch is by another 1.6000000.
Juanita Holmes
1:23:42
Arches.
1:23:43
Arches.
1:23:43
Arches was not being utilized.
Lincoln Restler
1:23:45
But they're not putting $1,600,000.
1:23:48
Are cut to our now?
1:23:49
Yes or no.
1:23:49
Yes or no.
1:23:50
Was there a peg from 1.6?
1:23:51
Yes.
1:23:52
Thank you very much.
Alex Stein
1:23:53
Mhmm.
1:23:53
So
Lincoln Restler
1:23:53
you I just gotta remind you, commissioner, you weren't under oath.
Alex Stein
1:23:55
I am under oath.
Juanita Holmes
1:23:55
I am under oath.
Lincoln Restler
1:23:56
Deny the things the facts that are real.
1:23:59
It undermines our faith and confidence in you, in this agency, and in this administration.
1:24:04
I am deeply concerned.
1:24:05
I'm deeply concerned.
Juanita Holmes
1:24:05
I'm deeply Your policy is in
Lincoln Restler
1:24:07
the driving up of mass incarceration of our young people in New York City, and I am deeply concerned by your testimony today.
1:24:12
I will be asking the office of general counsel to review its accuracy.
1:24:14
Thank you.
Juanita Holmes
1:24:15
You're welcome.
Citymeetings.nyc pigeon logo

Is citymeetings.nyc useful to you?

I'm thrilled!

Please help me out by answering just one question.

What do you do?

Thank you!

Want to stay up to date? Sign up for the newsletter.