QUESTION
Why does the preliminary plan show a budgeted headcount of 1111 staff for AMKC despite its closure?
2:54:06
·
85 sec
The council member inquires about the budgeted headcount for AMKC, a now-closed facility, and requests clarification on the staff allocations.
- The preliminary plan includes a budgeted headcount of 1111 staff for AMKC, which is now closed except for its kitchen.
- Deputy Commissioner Mala Srinivasan provides the overall fiscal year 24 headcount figures but does not directly address the specific query about AMKC staff.
- Council Member Sandy Nurse emphasizes the need for an explanation and rationale for allocating staff to a closed facility.
- The Deputy Commissioner commits to providing more detailed information on the headcount by building.
Sandy Nurse
2:54:06
Can you explain why the preliminary plan shows a budgeted headcount of 1111 staff allocated to AMKC in this current fiscal year preliminary plan.
Mala Srinivasan
2:54:22
I'm sorry.
2:54:23
Can you repeat the question stuff?
Sandy Nurse
2:54:25
Yes.
2:54:26
So AMKC is now closed except for the kitchen.
2:54:29
But in the preliminary plan, it shows a budgeted head count for 1111 staff for the building.
2:54:41
So can you ex explain that?
Mala Srinivasan
2:54:44
So currently, the fiscal year 24 head count as so the budgeted count is 1728 for non uniformed and 7 10.60 for uniform with a total headcount of 8788.
2:55:01
But I'm not sure if you're referring to the act tool headcount.
Sandy Nurse
2:55:07
I'm just I'm just showing what's reflected in the plan.
2:55:10
So maybe you could give us a a headcount if there are any staff allocated for AMKC, it would be great to get that number and and and a rationale for why they would be allocated to a building that is now closed.
2:55:22
Or what what they would be doing there.
Mala Srinivasan
2:55:26
We can get you more details by building.
2:55:29
Just a follow-up.
Sandy Nurse
2:55:30
Thank you.