Why could there not be similar lobbying restrictions for paid political consultants and fundraisers on former colleagues?
2:06:33
·
78 sec
Paul Ryan suggests such restrictions would likely face strict legal scrutiny as an untested approach, and regulating known lobbyists' activities would be more constitutionally defensible.
- He states he is unaware of any jurisdiction implementing restrictions on political consultants lobbying former colleagues
- Ryan indicates enacting such restrictions would likely face litigation under strict scrutiny from courts
- He argues there is an easier path by regulating the known universe of lobbyists' activities
- Ryan cites difficulty in winning such legal challenges as reason to pursue more defensible lobbying regulations
← Previous Chapter
What are the constitutional and administrative concerns raised regarding Intro 742's prohibition on lobbying activities by fundraisers and political consultants?
Next Chapter →
What would happen if the clerk's office was tasked with confirming a lobbyist's prior political activities? What structure does the NYC Campaign Finance Board envision to regulate such activities?