The citymeetings.nyc logo showing a pigeon at a podium with a microphone.

citymeetings.nyc

Your guide to NYC's public proceedings.

TESTIMONY

Adam Roberts, Policy Director for the Community Housing Improvement Program (CHIP), on Concerns with the New J51 Tax Abatement Program for Rent-Stabilized Buildings

2:09:01

·

166 sec

Adam Roberts from the Community Housing Improvement Program (CHIP) testifies that the proposed new J51 tax abatement program will be ineffective for most rent-stabilized buildings due to restrictive requirements.

  • The program requires owners to certify tenants' incomes, but owners cannot mandate tenants to provide salary information.
  • The area median income (AMI) eligibility bands of 20-80% AMI are too low for rent-stabilized units.
  • Even with government assistance, the 15-year regulatory agreement requirement is overly restrictive.
  • A one-time tax abatement does not address the core issue of rent-stabilized buildings not generating enough revenue to cover operational costs.
Adam Roberts
2:09:01
Thank you for holding this hearing today.
2:09:03
I am Adam Roberts, policy director for the community housing improvement program, also known as Chip.
2:09:09
We represent New York's housing providers, including apartment building owners and managers, We appreciate that the council is advocating for J 51 in large part because of the financial crisis hitting rent stabilized housing.
2:09:21
Rent stabilized housing represents 40% of rent stabilized rental housing in the city, which is around 1,000,000 units of housing.
2:09:29
However, we have strong concerns that this new J51 program will not be usable for most buildings with rent stabilized units.
2:09:35
Most glaringly, the bill requires that owners certify the income of tenants in order to qualify that for the program.
2:09:42
Owners cannot mandate that their tenants provide updated salary information.
2:09:46
Without this information, there's no means of proving that tenants fall within the necessary AMI marketing dance to qualify for J51.
2:09:54
Even if the legal rents fall into those bands.
2:09:57
The AMI bands themselves are also overly restrictive.
2:10:01
The bill requires at least 50% of units in a building rent within affordability bands from 20% of 80% of AMI.
2:10:08
To 30% of 80% of AMI.
2:10:11
For a single person, this range is $17,392.
2:10:16
To $26,088.
2:10:18
This would mean that affordable rents would be around $500 per month.
2:10:23
No rent stabilized building could operate with rent solo.
2:10:26
The average operating cost for rent stabilized unit is $1164.
2:10:32
With the rents required to qualify for this new J51, a building would need to be losing $664 in at least half of its units.
2:10:40
While there is a substantial government assistance option to qualify, this too is overly restrictive.
2:10:46
The definition of government assistance is a regulatory agreement of at least 15 years.
2:10:51
This means that accepting voucher holders or having a shorter term regulatory agreement would still not allow a building to qualify.
2:10:58
Even if this program were better designed, it would not solve the structural problems causing the financial crisis in rent statement.
Sharon Brown
2:11:05
Your time has expired.
2:11:06
Thank you.
Pierina Ana Sanchez
2:11:08
Adam, do you wanna conclude?
2:11:09
Go
Adam Roberts
2:11:10
You are.
2:11:11
Too many.
2:11:11
Many 1,000,000,000 of dollars in investment, far more than what J50 or any government program would provide are needed to improve rent stabilized housing.
2:11:19
For instance, Nitro requires $80,000,000,000 to improve its 180,000 unit which is less than a fifth the number of rent stabilized housing.
2:11:27
The only way to fix rent stabilized housing is to ensure revenue exceeds operating costs.
2:11:31
And this means regular influxes of revenue, whether from tenants or the government, must be provided, and operating costs must be reduced.
2:11:38
A one time tax abatement will not solve the problems that these buildings have, that they do not earn enough revenue to operate.
2:11:45
Again, thank you for holding, sir.
Citymeetings.nyc pigeon logo

Is citymeetings.nyc useful to you?

I'm thrilled!

Please help me out by answering just one question.

What do you do?

Thank you!

Want to stay up to date? Sign up for the newsletter.