QUESTION
What is the recommended process for ensuring ongoing review and attractiveness of incentive programs?
1:54:04
·
34 sec
The council member asks about a recommendation for an annual check-in process to discuss and ensure that incentive programs remain attractive and are properly implemented.
- There is a suggestion for an annual check-in to evaluate incentive programs
- The goal is to make sure the incentives stay attractive over time
- There is concern about maintaining close oversight, particularly for programs like 'day 51'
- The council member wants to avoid duplicating questions that have already been asked
Pierina Ana Sanchez
1:54:04
I have one of the organizations has recommended an annual check-in so we can we can discuss that further and just to make sure, you know, Kengard is there today, and this team is there today, but wanna make sure that we stay on top of day 51 and make sure that it's it's an attractive incentive.
1:54:25
Okay.
1:54:29
Okay.
1:54:30
I've asked a lot of these, so I'm trying not not to duplicate Questions.
1:54:37
Okay.
1:54:37
The application for the program requires evidence of eligibility as a satisfactory to HPD, showing the cost of construction, can you provide examples of what HPD considers to be satisfactory evidence of eligibility?