QUESTION
What entities will bear the financial burden of adjusting current biometric identification (BID) technologies for businesses and landlords?
1:01:26
·
62 sec
Council Member Vickie Paladino inquires about which parties will be responsible for covering the financial costs that businesses and landlords may incur to comply with legislation impacting their current biometric identification (BID) technologies.
- Kelly Moan, Chief Information Security Officer, states she cannot directly address the financial implications.
- However, she expresses openness from the Office of Technology and Innovation (OTI) to discuss the proposed implementation framework for the legislation.
- Moan clarifies that OTI regulates telecommunications infrastructure but not mobile app developers.
- She welcomes further dialogue to better understand the intent behind the council's proposed framework for the legislation.
Vickie Paladino
1:01:26
Who's gonna be responsible for the financial burden put upon businesses and landlords?
1:01:31
Parties.
1:01:31
You know, what's that?
Nina Loshkajian
1:01:33
Who were the 3rd parties?
Vickie Paladino
1:01:34
Who were the 3rd parties in sharing data?
1:01:38
That's question 2.
1:01:39
And I know there was a third okay.
1:01:42
We'll start with those 2.
Kelly Moan
1:01:44
So while I can't speak to the the financial burden, that you referenced as far as intro 539, in particular, OTI and the administration would welcome any an ongoing conversation related to the proposed implementation framework as it relates to this particular bill in in particular of greater having a greater understanding of what that framework, the intent of the council's proposal would be in terms of a framework.
1:02:14
As I mentioned, OTI does regulate the right of way for telecommunications infrastructure through our franchise group, but does not regulate mobile app and developers.
1:02:23
So that would be a conversation we would love to have.
Vickie Paladino
1:02:27
Okay.
