REMARKS
Concluding remarks on Mastro's suitability for the Corporation Counsel role
4:03:21
·
110 sec
Council Member Farías provides concluding remarks on Randy Mastro's testimony and his suitability for the role of Corporation Counsel. She expresses concerns about his past associations and actions.
- Farías emphasizes the importance of Mastro's responses in the council's decision-making process
- She highlights the contrast between Mastro's stated pro bono work and his representation of controversial clients
- Farías expresses concern about Mastro's time serving in an administration described as discriminatory, racist, and sexist
- She suggests that Mastro was either against these issues or complicit in them
- Farías states that the position of Corporation Counsel is about trust, not redemption
- Mastro attempts to respond, reiterating the relevance of certain information in the Bridgegate investigation
- The exchange ends with Council Member Powers moving on to the next questioner
Amanda Farías
4:03:21
Thank you for answering my questions.
4:03:23
I look forward to this supplemental information that you're going to provide with your testimony.
4:03:28
I really just wanna reiterate what some of my colleagues have said, you know, at the ends of all of this, We we have to make a decision based off of your responses here that the track record that we've seen both on who you've been a pro bono attorney to, but also the other side that you have taken on.
4:03:49
And I think while you are stating that you have a track record of this and that historically, some of the larger issues that's raised to us is the time that you served in an administration that was discriminatory, that was racist, that was sexist.
4:04:03
And you either are against all of those things, which you haven't blatantly, admittedly, like, stated yes or no to some of those questions, or you are complicit in that.
4:04:13
And I think for a lot of us, you know, corporation council isn't a position of redemption.
4:04:19
It's a position of trust.
4:04:21
I will wrap my time there.
Randy Mastro
4:04:23
Thank you.
4:04:23
Can can I please
Keith Powers
4:04:24
I'll give you 30 seconds to respond.
4:04:26
We're gonna go to Council member Abraham and Council member Abraham.
Randy Mastro
4:04:29
Thank you.
4:04:30
It was factually relevant to whether Bill Stepien was involved in the decision to close the bridge that he was no longer speaking to Bridget Kelly who clearly was, but to be clear.
4:04:42
So that was actually relevant to the investigation and the US attorney's office considered it relevant to the investigation.
4:04:49
But, again, we advocated on behalf of the governor's office that no one should have been federally charged by the US attorney's office and that's ultimately including Bridget Kelly because there was no federal crime.
4:05:01
And ultimately, the Supreme Court agreed 9 to nothing with us.
Keith Powers
4:05:06
Thank you.
4:05:06
Thank you.
4:05:07
We're gonna go to Council Robert Brown Inn, and it will be filed by Council Robert Brown.
