Q&A
Garodnick reiterates the limited scope of the proposal
4:15:18
·
41 sec
Daniel Garodnick provides a final response to Council Member Ariola's concerns, reiterating that the proposal does not allow for unrestricted development and emphasizing its targeted nature.
- Firmly states that the proposal does not allow for multifamily buildings to be built anywhere
- Offers to provide more detailed explanations of the proposal's specifics
- Describes the proposal as 'narrowly tailored, modest, and respectful'
- Emphasizes that the plan is designed to match existing buildings rather than drastically change neighborhoods
Daniel Garodnick
4:15:18
Thank you.
4:15:19
I just respectfully respond that it does not allow for multifamily buildings to be built anywhere.
4:15:26
There's a specific set of facts and circumstances present under this proposal.
4:15:30
We'd be happy to go through that with you at at a later date or now as you see fit, but it is not in anywhere, any kind hyper development.
4:15:39
This is a narrowly tailored, modest, respectful proposal that is designed to match existing buildings.
Kevin C. Riley
4:15:46
Thank you.
4:15:46
Counsel and I roll it.
4:15:47
Do you want second round questions?
4:15:49
Alright.
4:15:49
Thank you.
4:15:51
Next, I'm gonna call on council member Villas Lee Resler then Joseph.
4:15:55
Alright.
4:15:58
Council member, please.
