Q&A
Council member criticizes OTI's opposition to proposed AI legislation
0:17:43
·
65 sec
Council Member Jennifer Gutiérrez expresses disappointment with OTI's opposition to the proposed legislation on AI governance. She criticizes the lack of significant action from the AI Action Plan and questions OTI's interpretation of Intro 1024.
- Gutiérrez highlights the council's efforts to build trust with the administration
- She emphasizes the legislation's goal of creating more transparency and openness with the public
- The council member specifically questions OTI's interpretation of a 'blanket approval process' in Intro 1024
Jennifer Gutiérrez
0:17:43
I think just going off of your responses to the legislation, obviously, I'm disappointed because it sounds like OTI is in opposition to every legislation that we wanted to discuss today, alleging that a lot of the benefits would be covered in the action plan, but we have yet to see significant action from the action plan.
0:18:04
I know the agency has been super excited.
0:18:07
That the progress report, you know, accomplished more than than you all set to accomplish as far as covering specifics specific principles and and so forth.
0:18:20
But the council has been working diligently to build trust with this administration, and we think that these specific bills create more transparency, more openness with the public.
0:18:31
So just curious specifically for intro 1024, I've reread the legislation.
0:18:37
I've read it again just now.
0:18:39
I'm I'm not certain that I understand where the assumption of a blanket approval process exists as you stated in your remarks.
0:18:46
I don't know if you wanna expand that?
