Your guide to NYC's public proceedings.

PUBLIC TESTIMONY

Testimony by Anya Weinstock, Attorney at Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, on Digital Stop and Frisk

3:36:27

·

3 min

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
Â
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected

      Anya Weinstock, an attorney with the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, testified about how NYPD technologies are replicating the injustices of stop and frisk in digital form. She highlighted the racial bias and errors in various surveillance tools, particularly focusing on ShotSpotter, and called for legislative action to mitigate these abuses.

      • Weinstock described the NYPD's vast surveillance network, including databases, cameras, and monitoring tools, which can be accessed by officers and used as pretexts for unconstitutional stops.
      • She specifically criticized ShotSpotter as error-prone and a driver of discriminatory stops, citing its 90% inaccuracy rate and potential to lead to dangerous confrontations.
      • The testimony concluded with calls to abolish the gangs database and ShotSpotter, and to pass resolutions against technologies that lead to discriminatory and ineffective stops.