Your guide to NYC's public proceedings.
Q&A
Inquiry into developments not participating in RAD/PACT and Fairstead case
1:44:16
ยท
71 sec
Council Member Mealy presses NYCHA officials for specific numbers on developments not participating in RAD/PACT, particularly focusing on 14 Fairstead developments in her district. NYCHA's Simon Kawitzky struggles to provide exact figures but claims all developments agreed after engagement.
- NYCHA unable to provide specific numbers on non-participating developments
- Focus on 14 Fairstead developments in Council Member's district
- NYCHA claims all developments agreed, but specifics are lacking
Darlene Mealy
1:44:16
How many are they?
1:44:18
How many are they that is not in RAD and PACT right now?
1:44:22
They chose not to get in it.
Simon Kawitzky
1:44:24
Oh.
1:44:25
Could you give me how many?
1:44:26
It's hard to give that number because we're out in the fields constantly talking to people about the PACT program.
1:44:33
So it's hard to give an exact number right now.
Darlene Mealy
1:44:35
So y'all could give me statistics of my district.
1:44:38
I'm 41.
1:44:40
Y'all gave Fairstead Fourteen developments in my district.
1:44:45
They never had no experience with doing development.
1:44:49
So give me how many of those 14 developments agreed to be Rad and Pat.
1:44:56
Y'all have people.
1:44:57
Right?
Simon Kawitzky
1:44:58
So for the Reed and Park Rock consolidated portfolio that that you're referring to, council member, we did all of the robust engagement that we previously described with the resident leaders at those developments Here.
1:45:12
And moved forward based on Something different.
1:45:14
Process.
Darlene Mealy
1:45:15
Many agree that they want to become Rad and Pac?
1:45:19
Could you give me that number?
Simon Kawitzky
1:45:21
They they all did because we did robust engagement with the resident leaders at those developments.