Ari S, Structural Engineer, on concerns about City of Yes for Housing Opportunity's impact on affordability and neighborhood-specific needs
14:38:28
·
3 min
Ari S, a lifelong New Yorker and structural engineer, expresses concerns about the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity proposal, particularly its potential impact on housing affordability and neighborhood-specific needs. Based on personal experience, Ari argues that similar development initiatives have not resulted in more affordable housing in New York City.
- Questions the proposal's ability to guarantee affordable housing, citing examples of neighborhoods that became less affordable after increased development
- Advocates for neighborhood-specific studies and consultations to address varying needs across different areas of the city
- Raises concerns about the potential reduction of green spaces, sunlight, and shared community spaces, as well as the strain on existing infrastructure and resources
- The proposal does not guarantee affordable housing
- Neighborhoods with increased development have become less affordable
- Neighborhoods with individual homeowners and 2-3 family homes are more affordable
- Concerns about one-size-fits-all approach without considering neighborhood-specific needs
- Lack of access to public transportation in some neighborhoods leads to parking issues
- Concerns about reduction in green spaces, sunlight, and shared community spaces
- Need for infrastructure and resource updates before introducing new housing
- Suggestion to explore other means of addressing housing affordability, such as not increasing rent stabilization
[EXPERIMENTAL]
Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?
- Parking Mandates
The following are AI-extracted quotes and reasoning about which elements of the proposal were discussed in this testimony.
This is a quick, close approximation. Occasionally, the connection between a testimony's transcript and specific elements of City Planning's proposal is tenuous.
Read about this AI-generated analysis here.
Parking Mandates
"I live in a neighborhood where most people do not have access to the train. So A lot of the buildings that have gone up have eliminated parking, and people in my neighborhood drive around for 1 hour trying to find parking and a parking space in some of these new buildings. Sells for $90,000."
This quote directly addresses the issue of removing parking mandates. The speaker is discussing how the elimination of parking in new buildings has affected their neighborhood, which is related to the proposal's aim to end parking mandates for new housing.
About this analysis:
This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.
All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.
You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.
When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.
But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.
In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.