Your guide to NYC's public proceedings.
Bobbi Barnett from Manhattan Community Board 4 on supporting the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity zoning amendment
13:41:12
·
3 min
Bobbi Barnett, a lifelong New Yorker, Manhattan resident, and Manhattan Community Board 4 member, testifies in support of the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity zoning amendment. She urges the City Planning Commission to approve the amendment in full, citing the need to address the housing shortage and update outdated zoning codes.
- Highlights specific aspects of the proposal, including the reduction of the dwelling unit factor and the Universal Affordability Preference (UAP)
- Emphasizes the benefits of shared housing models for young people and those exiting shelters
- Argues that the benefits of additional affordable units outweigh concerns about modest height increases in buildings
- Encourages approval of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity
- Supports reduction and elimination of dwelling unit factor
- Supports universal affordability preference (UAP)
- Believes benefits of additional affordable units outweigh concerns about increased building height
- Appreciates DCP's engagement with community boards
- Argues for quicker review process to address housing shortage
- Urges CPC not to exempt any neighborhoods from housing obligations
- Emphasizes the interconnected nature of New York City's housing market
[EXPERIMENTAL]
Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?
- UAP
- Small and Shared Housing
The following are AI-extracted quotes and reasoning about which elements of the proposal were discussed in this testimony.
This is a quick, close approximation. Occasionally, the connection between a testimony's transcript and specific elements of City Planning's proposal is tenuous.
Read about this AI-generated analysis here.
UAP
"UAP would create new permanently rent stabilized units for those who are increasingly priced out of communities like mine."
This quote directly addresses the Universal Affordability Preference (UAP) element of the proposal, discussing its potential benefits in creating affordable housing.
"While I have heard concerns about allowing developers additional height as a part of UAP, I believe that the benefits of additional affordable units are well worth the modest additional height that these buildings may bring."
This quote further discusses the UAP element, acknowledging potential concerns but emphasizing the speaker's support for the benefits it would bring in terms of affordable housing.
Small and Shared Housing
"Eliminating the dwelling unit factor unlocks new housing up opportunity for groups that are currently stuck in place. Creating shared housing can enable young people to afford to live without roommates and free up family sized apartments."
This quote directly addresses the small and shared housing element of the proposal, discussing how it can benefit young people and free up larger apartments for families.
"Shared housing models can also help more of those exiting shelter to move into permanent supportive housing."
This quote further elaborates on the benefits of shared housing models, which is a key aspect of the small and shared housing element of the proposal.
About this analysis:
This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.
All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.
You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.
When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.
But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.
In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.
Follow-up discussion/remarks
Chair Garodnick thanks Barnett for addressing concerns about citywide approach
13:44:24
·
23 sec
Dan Garodnick, Chair of the City Planning Commission, expresses appreciation for Bobbi Barnett's testimony, particularly her comments on the 'one size fits all' approach and the potential negative impacts of individual community board reviews.
- Garodnick acknowledges Barnett's support for a citywide approach rather than project-by-project reviews
- He emphasizes the importance of this approach in achieving the city's housing goals
- The Chair's comments suggest alignment with the overall objectives of the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity initiative
- Encourages approval of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity
- Supports reduction and elimination of dwelling unit factor
- Supports universal affordability preference (UAP)
- Believes benefits of additional affordable units outweigh concerns about increased building height
- Appreciates DCP's engagement with community boards
- Argues for quicker review process to address housing shortage
- Urges CPC not to exempt any neighborhoods from housing obligations
- Emphasizes the interconnected nature of New York City's housing market
[EXPERIMENTAL]
Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?
- UAP
- Small and Shared Housing
The following are AI-extracted quotes and reasoning about which elements of the proposal were discussed in this testimony.
This is a quick, close approximation. Occasionally, the connection between a testimony's transcript and specific elements of City Planning's proposal is tenuous.
Read about this AI-generated analysis here.
UAP
"UAP would create new permanently rent stabilized units for those who are increasingly priced out of communities like mine."
This quote directly addresses the Universal Affordability Preference (UAP) element of the proposal, discussing its potential benefits in creating affordable housing.
"While I have heard concerns about allowing developers additional height as a part of UAP, I believe that the benefits of additional affordable units are well worth the modest additional height that these buildings may bring."
This quote further discusses the UAP element, acknowledging potential concerns but emphasizing the speaker's support for the benefits it would bring in terms of affordable housing.
Small and Shared Housing
"Eliminating the dwelling unit factor unlocks new housing up opportunity for groups that are currently stuck in place. Creating shared housing can enable young people to afford to live without roommates and free up family sized apartments."
This quote directly addresses the small and shared housing element of the proposal, discussing how it can benefit young people and free up larger apartments for families.
"Shared housing models can also help more of those exiting shelter to move into permanent supportive housing."
This quote further elaborates on the benefits of shared housing models, which is a key aspect of the small and shared housing element of the proposal.
About this analysis:
This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.
All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.
You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.
When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.
But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.
In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.