Your guide to NYC's public proceedings.
Cathleen Shannon from A Better College Point Civic Association on concerns about City of Yes proposal's impact on local population and infrastructure
10:30:02
·
3 min
Cathleen Shannon, a board member of A Better College Point Civic Association, requests a 'no' vote on the City of Yes proposal. She expresses concerns about overpopulation, parking issues, and strain on local infrastructure in College Point.
- Highlights the area's existing overpopulation and limited transportation options
- Emphasizes the need for maintaining mandated parking due to car dependency in the area
- Raises concerns about overcrowding in schools, public spaces, and the lack of enforcement of current laws
- The area is already overpopulated
- Against building that doesn't make sense
- Concerns about losing mandated parking
- Limited transportation options in the area
- Safety concerns on subways
- Schools and public spaces are already overcrowded
- Lack of enforcement of current laws
- Insufficient infrastructure and public services (police, teachers, inspectors)
- Request to alter the plan
[EXPERIMENTAL]
Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?
- Parking Mandates
The following are AI-extracted quotes and reasoning about which elements of the proposal were discussed in this testimony.
This is a quick, close approximation. Occasionally, the connection between a testimony's transcript and specific elements of City Planning's proposal is tenuous.
Read about this AI-generated analysis here.
Parking Mandates
"I think if you lose the mandated parking, it's gonna create even more problems."
This quote directly addresses the proposal's element of removing parking mandates. The speaker expresses concern about the potential problems that could arise from removing required parking.
"The parking is a big thing in this area and the and the cars because we have limited transportation available, and that new transportation plan is far from perfect."
This quote further elaborates on the speaker's concerns about removing parking mandates, emphasizing the importance of parking in their area due to limited public transportation options.
About this analysis:
This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.
All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.
You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.
When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.
But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.
In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.