Darrick Borowski, Architect and Member of the Housing Committee at AIA, on supporting City of Yes for Housing Opportunity and addressing New York City's housing crisis
2:34:24
·
164 sec
Darrick Borowski, an architect and member of the AIA Housing Committee, speaks in support of the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity initiative. He argues that changing the zoning code is crucial to addressing New York City's housing crisis and maintaining its vitality.
- Borowski emphasizes that current zoning codes, largely unchanged since 1961, have contributed to the present housing crisis and limit possible solutions.
- He supports proposals in the draft plan, including affordability bonuses, housing over retail, legalizing shared living, and eliminating parking requirements.
- Borowski acknowledges concerns about increased density but urges commissioners to prioritize creating housing opportunities and vote yes for the City of Yes initiative.
- Current zoning code from 1961 has contributed to the housing crisis
- Changing codes is necessary to create affordable housing for all incomes
- Supports proposals in the plan such as bonuses for affordability, housing over retail, legalizing shared living, small apartments, ADUs, and eliminating parking requirements
- Housing affordability is crucial for maintaining New York City's vitality and cultural diversity
- Many New Yorkers, including young professionals and creatives, are struggling to afford housing
- Acknowledges concerns about increased density but believes prioritizing housing creation is necessary
- Urges commissioners to vote yes for City of Yes for Housing Opportunity
[EXPERIMENTAL]
Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?
- UAP
- Town Center Zoning
- Parking Mandates
- ADU
- Small and Shared Housing
The following are AI-extracted quotes and reasoning about which elements of the proposal were discussed in this testimony.
This is a quick, close approximation. Occasionally, the connection between a testimony's transcript and specific elements of City Planning's proposal is tenuous.
Read about this AI-generated analysis here.
UAP
"In this draft, I see proposals that enable many of the possibilities my colleagues students and IFCS tools to help us get get us out of this current crisis, including bonuses for affordability"
The speaker mentions 'bonuses for affordability' which aligns with the Universal Affordability Preference (UAP) element of the proposal that allows buildings to add more housing if it's affordable.
Town Center Zoning
"In this draft, I see proposals that enable many of the possibilities my colleagues students and IFCS tools to help us get get us out of this current crisis, including [...] housing over retail in town centers"
The speaker explicitly mentions 'housing over retail in town centers', which directly relates to the Town Center Zoning element of the proposal.
Parking Mandates
"In this draft, I see proposals that enable many of the possibilities my colleagues students and IFCS tools to help us get get us out of this current crisis, including [...] eliminating parking requirements"
The speaker explicitly mentions 'eliminating parking requirements', which directly corresponds to the Removing Parking Mandates element of the proposal.
ADU
"In this draft, I see proposals that enable many of the possibilities my colleagues students and IFCS tools to help us get get us out of this current crisis, including [...] ADUs"
The speaker explicitly mentions 'ADUs', which is the acronym for Accessory Dwelling Units, directly addressing this element of the proposal.
Small and Shared Housing
"In this draft, I see proposals that enable many of the possibilities my colleagues students and IFCS tools to help us get get us out of this current crisis, including [...] legalizing shared living, small apartments"
The speaker explicitly mentions 'legalizing shared living, small apartments', which directly corresponds to the Small and Shared Housing element of the proposal.
About this analysis:
This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.
All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.
You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.
When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.
But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.
In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.