Diane Viggiano from Old Town Civic Association of Staten Island on concerns about City of Yes for Housing Opportunity's impact on Staten Island
5:49:45
·
150 sec
Diane Viggiano, representing the Old Town Civic Association of Staten Island, expresses strong opposition to the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity plan. She argues that the proposed changes would negatively impact Staten Island's quality of life, infrastructure, and environment.
- Criticizes the plan for promoting high-rise buildings along Staten Island Rapid Transit and encouraging multi-family habitation in homes' attics, basements, and garages
- Opposes the idea of backyard cottages, citing concerns about reduced light, air, and tree coverage
- Argues against eliminating parking requirements, noting the prevalence of car ownership and multi-generational households on Staten Island
- Urges planners to reconsider the proposal, suggesting a focus on repurposing empty buildings in Manhattan instead
- Opposition to high-rise buildings along Staten Island Rapid Transit
- Concern about promoting multifamily habitation in attics, basements, and garages
- Opposition to building cottages in backyards, which could reduce light, air, and trees
- Disagreement with eliminating parking space requirements for new construction
- Worry about degradation of quality of life due to increased housing, traffic, and population
- Concern about strain on infrastructure, educational and medical services
- Request for a borough-specific plan instead of a one-size-fits-all approach
- Suggestion to consider using empty buildings in Manhattan for housing
- Appeal to preserve the 'American dream' of a peaceful place to live and raise families
[EXPERIMENTAL]
Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?
- Residential Conversions
- Parking Mandates
- ADU
- Transit-Oriented Development
The following are AI-extracted quotes and reasoning about which elements of the proposal were discussed in this testimony.
This is a quick, close approximation. Occasionally, the connection between a testimony's transcript and specific elements of City Planning's proposal is tenuous.
Read about this AI-generated analysis here.
Residential Conversions
"Also, your plan promotes multifamily habitation on every bit of in inhabitable space in our homes, including attics, basements, and garages."
This quote discusses the proposal's aim to allow for residential conversions of non-traditional living spaces, which aligns with the Residential Conversions element of the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity plan.
Parking Mandates
"To top it off, your plan would eliminate the need for parking spaces in new construction even though most presidents on Staten Island commute by car, with some homes having 4 or 5 cars, one for each family member."
This quote directly addresses the proposal's plan to remove parking mandates for new construction, which is a key element of the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity plan.
ADU
"You even came up with the idea of allowing the building of cottages in backyards, which would cut off the light and air in our neighborhoods."
This quote directly refers to the proposal's plan to allow Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), specifically mentioning backyard cottages, which is a key component of the ADU element in the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity plan.
Transit-Oriented Development
"For example, you proposed the addition of high rise buildings in areas along the Staten Island Rapid Transit."
This quote discusses the proposal's plan to add high-rise buildings near public transit, which aligns with the Transit-Oriented Development element of the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity plan.
About this analysis:
This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.
All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.
You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.
When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.
But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.
In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.
Follow-up discussion/remarks
Chair Garodnick clarifies aspects of City of Yes housing proposal
5:52:17
·
120 sec
Dan Garodnick, Chair of the City Planning Commission, responds to concerns raised by a Staten Island resident about the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity proposal. He clarifies several points, emphasizing that the proposal aims to be more flexible and accommodating than initially perceived.
- Explains that office-to-residential conversions are intended to fill empty buildings in Manhattan and beyond
- Clarifies that the proposal doesn't eliminate parking needs but removes minimum mandates
- Emphasizes that 'high-rise' buildings are not being proposed, defining the suggested 3-5 story buildings as modest
- Notes that accessory dwelling units (backyard cottages) are optional for homeowners, not mandated
- Opposition to high-rise buildings along Staten Island Rapid Transit
- Concern about promoting multifamily habitation in attics, basements, and garages
- Opposition to building cottages in backyards, which could reduce light, air, and trees
- Disagreement with eliminating parking space requirements for new construction
- Worry about degradation of quality of life due to increased housing, traffic, and population
- Concern about strain on infrastructure, educational and medical services
- Request for a borough-specific plan instead of a one-size-fits-all approach
- Suggestion to consider using empty buildings in Manhattan for housing
- Appeal to preserve the 'American dream' of a peaceful place to live and raise families
[EXPERIMENTAL]
Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?
- Residential Conversions
- Parking Mandates
- ADU
- Transit-Oriented Development
The following are AI-extracted quotes and reasoning about which elements of the proposal were discussed in this testimony.
This is a quick, close approximation. Occasionally, the connection between a testimony's transcript and specific elements of City Planning's proposal is tenuous.
Read about this AI-generated analysis here.
Residential Conversions
"Also, your plan promotes multifamily habitation on every bit of in inhabitable space in our homes, including attics, basements, and garages."
This quote discusses the proposal's aim to allow for residential conversions of non-traditional living spaces, which aligns with the Residential Conversions element of the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity plan.
Parking Mandates
"To top it off, your plan would eliminate the need for parking spaces in new construction even though most presidents on Staten Island commute by car, with some homes having 4 or 5 cars, one for each family member."
This quote directly addresses the proposal's plan to remove parking mandates for new construction, which is a key element of the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity plan.
ADU
"You even came up with the idea of allowing the building of cottages in backyards, which would cut off the light and air in our neighborhoods."
This quote directly refers to the proposal's plan to allow Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), specifically mentioning backyard cottages, which is a key component of the ADU element in the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity plan.
Transit-Oriented Development
"For example, you proposed the addition of high rise buildings in areas along the Staten Island Rapid Transit."
This quote discusses the proposal's plan to add high-rise buildings near public transit, which aligns with the Transit-Oriented Development element of the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity plan.
About this analysis:
This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.
All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.
You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.
When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.
But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.
In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.