Dorothy Windham from Open New York on support for City of Yes plan and affordable housing initiatives
1:53:53
·
72 sec
Dorothy Windham, a young resident of the Upper West Side and member of Open New York, expresses strong support for the City of Yes plan to address rising housing costs and create affordable housing opportunities in New York City. She emphasizes the need for city growth and the creation of more housing units to ensure a sustainable future for young residents like herself.
- Windham specifically endorses the Universal Affordability Preference (UAP) proposal and the re-legalization of new NRSROs (likely referring to Single Room Occupancy units)
- She argues that rejecting growth would have stunted New York's development, drawing a parallel to the city's history
- Windham highlights the potential consequences of inaction, including higher prices, struggling businesses, and families being forced to live in cramped conditions or move away
- Concern about rising cost of housing for young people
- Support for City of Yes plan to allow New York to grow
- Excitement about creation of permanent affordable housing through UIP proposal
- Support for re-legalization of new NRSROs
- Belief that growth is necessary for New York's future
- Concern about consequences of not building new housing (higher prices, struggling businesses, families squeezed or moving away)
- Hope that City of Yes will make living in New York more affordable
[EXPERIMENTAL]
Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?
- UAP
- Small and Shared Housing
The following are AI-extracted quotes and reasoning about which elements of the proposal were discussed in this testimony.
This is a quick, close approximation. Occasionally, the connection between a testimony's transcript and specific elements of City Planning's proposal is tenuous.
Read about this AI-generated analysis here.
UAP
"I'm particularly excited about the creation of permanent affordable housing through the UIP proposal"
The speaker directly mentions the UAP (referred to as UIP, likely a misspeak) as a part of the City of Yes plan that they are excited about. This shows they are discussing the Universal Affordability Preference element of the proposal.
Small and Shared Housing
"I'm particularly excited about the creation of permanent affordable housing through the UIP proposal as well as the re legalization of new NRSROs."
The speaker mentions being excited about the 're legalization of new NRSROs'. NRSROs likely refers to Single Room Occupancy units, which fall under the Small and Shared Housing element of the City of Yes proposal. This shows they are discussing this aspect of the proposal.
"Both policies will create warehousing units, and I want those changes to come to my neighborhood."
The speaker refers to 'warehousing units', which in this context likely means small, affordable housing units. This further reinforces their discussion of the Small and Shared Housing element of the proposal.
About this analysis:
This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.
All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.
You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.
When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.
But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.
In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.