Eric Rosenbaum, President and CEO of Project Renewal, on addressing homelessness and affordable housing through City of Yes zoning reforms
2:37:31
·
165 sec
Eric Rosenbaum, representing Project Renewal, a major homeless service provider in NYC, speaks in favor of the City of Yes initiative. He emphasizes the critical role of stable housing in addressing homelessness, mental health issues, substance use disorders, and public safety concerns.
- Highlights the historical context of housing inequality, including discriminatory practices like the GI Bill and urban renewal projects
- Argues that City of Yes proposals can significantly impact affordable housing availability by overhauling zoning regulations
- Predicts that increasing affordability will reduce homelessness and address root causes of generational challenges, leading to a more affordable and safer New York City
- Stable housing is the foundation for resilient families and communities
- Lack of affordable housing contributes to mental health issues, overdose crises, and public safety problems
- Historical housing discrimination has created profound inequity, especially for people of color
- City of Yes proposals can address affordable housing availability and reduce homelessness
- Increasing affordability will address root causes of mental health challenges, substance disorders, and criminal justice involvement
- The alternative is increased spending on shelters, mental health treatment, and jails
- City of Yes will make New York City more affordable and safer for families at all income levels
[EXPERIMENTAL]
Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?
I was not able to tie quotes from the testimony back to specific elements of the proposal. Check out another testimony here.
About this analysis:
This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.
All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.
You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.
When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.
But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.
In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.