Eustacia Smith from West Side Federation for Senior and Supportive Housing on City of Yes for Housing and need for additional senior housing incentives
9:52:38
·
3 min
Eustacia Smith, representing the West Side Federation for Senior and Supportive Housing (WSFSH), expresses strong support for the City of Yes for Housing initiative while emphasizing the need for additional measures to protect and increase affordable senior housing. Smith highlights the disproportionate impact of the housing crisis on older New Yorkers and the urgent need for deeply affordable units.
- Supports Universal Affordability Preference, zoning changes to allow affordable housing citywide, and development of small shared housing
- Calls for additional incentives specifically for senior housing development to prevent it from being overshadowed by general affordable housing
- Recommends setting annual production goals, including at least 1,000 new deeply affordable senior housing units with funded services per year
- Support for City of Yes for Housing Opportunity zoning changes
- Need for affordable senior housing in New York City
- Disproportionate impact of housing crisis on older New Yorkers
- Support for universal affordability preference
- Support for changing outdated zoning regulations
- Support for development of small shared housing
- Need for additional incentives for senior housing development
- Call for city to set annual production and preservation goals for affordable senior housing
- Recommendation for at least 1000 new units of deeply affordable senior housing with fully funded services per year
- Importance of protecting and prioritizing production of deeply affordable senior housing with services
[EXPERIMENTAL]
Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?
- UAP
- Small and Shared Housing
The following are AI-extracted quotes and reasoning about which elements of the proposal were discussed in this testimony.
This is a quick, close approximation. Occasionally, the connection between a testimony's transcript and specific elements of City Planning's proposal is tenuous.
Read about this AI-generated analysis here.
UAP
"We support universal affordability preference because it won't mean additional affordable and port of housing would be built by giving developments of density bonus."
This quote directly mentions and expresses support for the Universal Affordability Preference, which is a key element of the City of Yes For Housing Opportunity proposal.
Small and Shared Housing
"We support the aspects of City of Yes that would allow for the development of small shared housing, which could significantly increase housing apply, but our experience running that kind of housing has shown that it must be paired with adequately funded on-site services."
This quote directly mentions and expresses support for the small and shared housing aspect of the City of Yes proposal, which is a key element of the plan.
About this analysis:
This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.
All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.
You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.
When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.
But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.
In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.