George Calderaro, board member of several NYC civic organizations, on City of Yes for Housing Opportunity and affordable housing concerns
2:56:43
·
168 sec
George Calderaro, representing several New York City civic organizations, criticizes the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity initiative as part of a broader effort to deregulate development in NYC. He argues that these proposals do not prioritize or require affordable housing, and instead potentially eliminate important regulations.
- Calderaro views the initiative as a developer-driven attempt to deregulate the city for private real estate development
- He emphasizes that preservation efforts, including historic districts, have protected thousands of businesses and affordable housing units
- Calderaro urges officials to focus on preventing the demolition of viable buildings that could be used for housing, citing examples like the Hotel Pennsylvania
- City of Yes is part of a multipronged offensive to deregulate development in NYC
- The proposal does not prioritize or require affordable housing
- There are many empty market rate and luxury units already
- The initiative is a developer-driven plot to deregulate the city for private real estate development
- City of Yes eliminates important regulations including special zoning districts, landmarks commission reviews, and open space requirements
- Preservation of historic districts preserves thousands of businesses and affordable housing units
- Demolition of viable, historically significant buildings should be stopped
- Criticism of City of Yes should not be dismissed as NIMBY-ism
- Concerns for communities are considered and sincere
[EXPERIMENTAL]
Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?
I was not able to tie quotes from the testimony back to specific elements of the proposal. Check out another testimony here.
About this analysis:
This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.
All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.
You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.
When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.
But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.
In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.