The citymeetings.nyc logo showing a pigeon at a podium with a microphone.

citymeetings.nyc

Your guide to NYC's public proceedings.

TESTIMONY

Manhattan Borough President Mark Levine on City of Yes for Housing Opportunity zoning reform

1:11:05

·

5 min

Report an issue

Manhattan Borough President Mark Levine testifies in support of the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity zoning reform proposal, recommending approval with conditions. He highlights the potential for the proposal to alleviate New York's housing shortage by adding housing across all boroughs and increasing affordability citywide.

  • Levine emphasizes the need to update the 1961 zoning code, which he sees as an obstacle to building necessary housing
  • He supports key aspects of the proposal, including the Universal Affordability Preference (UAP), office-to-residential conversions, and development on residential campuses
  • Levine reports that the Manhattan Borough Board has approved 15 key recommendations in the proposal, indicating broad support for addressing affordability challenges
  • The city is experiencing a severe housing shortage and high rents
  • Current zoning code from 1961 is an obstacle to building needed housing
  • City of Yes for Housing Opportunity would help alleviate the housing shortage
  • Universal Affordable Preference (UAP) would increase affordable housing stock
  • The proposal would reduce roadblocks for converting vacant offices to residential units
  • Changes would allow for development on large residential campuses, including those owned by faith-based organizations
  • Manhattan Borough Board approved 15 key recommendations in the proposal
  • The proposal could potentially catalyze the production of 100,000 new units

[EXPERIMENTAL]

Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?

  • UAP
  • Residential Conversions
  • Town Center Zoning
  • Parking Mandates
  • Transit-Oriented Development
  • Campuses

The following are AI-extracted quotes and reasoning about which elements of the proposal were discussed in this testimony.

This is a quick, close approximation. Occasionally, the connection between a testimony's transcript and specific elements of City Planning's proposal is tenuous.

Read about this AI-generated analysis here.

UAP

"The proposal for universal affordable pre affordability preference promises to significantly increase our affordable housing stock throughout Manhattan with a relatively low income target of 60% AMI."

This quote directly mentions the Universal Affordability Preference (UAP) and its goal to increase affordable housing with a specific AMI target, which aligns with the proposal's description.

"In order to ensure that UAP is maximized, I recommend that CPC be required to certify that the UAP option has been effectively used by condo and co op developments prior to eliminating the off-site option."

This quote discusses recommendations for implementing the UAP, showing that the speaker is addressing this specific element of the proposal.

Residential Conversions

"City of Yes for housing opportunity would also reduce roadblocks for the conversion of vacant and underutilized offices into residential and unlock unlock a projected 6000 units over the next 16 years."

This quote directly addresses the residential conversions element of the proposal, mentioning the conversion of vacant offices into residential units, which aligns with the proposal's description.

"Our current zoning code makes it hard to convert vacant office buildings to residences."

This quote highlights the current issue that the residential conversions element of the proposal aims to address, showing that the speaker is discussing this aspect of the proposal.

Town Center Zoning

"It leaves little housing next to some transit hubs, and prevents apartments from being built on top of stores in some commercial districts."

This quote addresses the issue of limited housing in commercial areas, which the Town Center Zoning element of the proposal aims to address by allowing housing above businesses in commercial areas.

Parking Mandates

"It prioritizes construction of parking over apartments."

This quote directly addresses the issue of prioritizing parking over housing, which the removing parking mandates element of the proposal aims to address.

Transit-Oriented Development

"It leaves little housing next to some transit hubs"

This quote indirectly references the issue of limited housing near transit, which the Transit-Oriented Development element of the proposal aims to address.

Campuses

"Lastly, our residential comp our large residential campuses on sites such as those owned by faith based organizations. May have development rights today, but with zoning constraints that because of contextual constraints, quality housing, prevent quality housing from being built on these campuses."

This quote directly addresses the Campuses element of the proposal, discussing the current constraints and the potential for development on faith-based organization campuses.

"The proposals and city of yes for housing. Would allow shorter bulkier buildings to be built on these campuses while aligning distance between building between buildings Excuse me, with state law in establishing maximum lot coverage to maintain open space."

This quote further elaborates on the proposed changes for campus development, which aligns with the Campuses element of the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity proposal.


About this analysis:

This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.

All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.

You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.

When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.

But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.

In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.

↗ Why are there transcription and diarization errors?
Mark Levine
1:11:05
Hello, Chegger, Rhonda.
1:11:06
Hello, everyone.
1:11:08
It's great morning.
1:11:09
Thank you for this opportunity to testify on city of yes for housing opportunity.
1:11:16
Our city is experiencing intense demand for housing, a severe shortage of supply, and an anemic rate of housing production.
1:11:25
These trends have resulted in catastrophically high rents that threatened to upturn the lives of a whole generation of New Yorkers.
1:11:34
And one of the biggest obstacles to solving this crisis is actually one of our own making.
1:11:39
A zoning code from 1961 That makes it far too difficult for us to build the housing New Yorkers desperately need.
1:11:48
Our current zoning code makes it hard to convert vacant office buildings to residences.
1:11:54
It prioritizes construction of parking over apartments.
1:11:58
It leaves little housing next to some transit hubs, and prevents apartments from being built on top of stores in some commercial districts.
1:12:06
And worst of all, it does too little to ensure construction of truly affordable homes.
1:12:12
Now
Brian Shrout
1:12:13
we have
Mark Levine
1:12:13
a chance to fix this.
1:12:15
CBS for housing opportunity would help alleviate New York's severe housing shortage.
1:12:21
By adding a little bit of housing in every neighborhood of the 5 boroughs.
1:12:25
Because our region operates in many ways as a single market, When we build a little bit of housing everywhere, we increase affordability everywhere.
1:12:36
I've submitted my recommendation in support of this text amendment, a yes with conditions.
1:12:42
And I wanna briefly highlight some of the key points in our recommendations.
1:12:46
Including some ideas for how it can be approved.
1:12:49
The proposal for universal affordable pre affordability preference promises to significantly increase our affordable housing stock throughout Manhattan with a relatively low income target of 60% AMI.
1:13:02
Yes, we currently have mandatory inclusionary housing, which has been a successful tool, but it can only be utilized through a rezoning.
1:13:10
Which places significant barriers on its productivity.
1:13:14
So far, according to my office's analysis, only 2% of Manhattan is currently mapped for my In order to ensure that UAP is maximized, I recommend that CPC be required to certify that the UAP option has been effectively used by condo and co op developments prior to eliminating the off-site option.
1:13:35
And that any supportive housing includes spaces for programming.
1:13:40
City of Yes for housing opportunity would also reduce roadblocks for the conversion of vacant and underutilized offices into residential and unlock unlock a projected 6000 units over the next 16 years.
1:13:54
Now is the time for the city to act on this because the state has just paved the way for conversions by passing a tax abatement for these projects and lifting the 12 FA Arc cap.
1:14:05
I do, however, recommend that this proposal include a sunset date for eligible buildings.
1:14:10
The inclusion of guidelines for conversions within historic districts, and a requirement for building amenities like large trash rooms, packages, and bicycle storage.
1:14:21
Lastly, our residential comp our large residential campuses on sites such as those owned by faith based organizations.
1:14:30
May have development rights today, but with zoning constraints that because of contextual constraints, quality housing, prevent quality housing from being built on these campuses.
1:14:42
The proposals and city of yes for housing.
1:14:45
Would allow shorter bulkier buildings to be built on these campuses while aligning distance between building between buildings Excuse me, with state law in establishing maximum lot coverage to maintain open space.
1:15:02
These changes would increase the opportunities for new housing to be built and provide important sources for revenue for the existing housing development or the face faith based organizations themselves.
1:15:13
I also recommend mitigation for the loss of open space on campuses, affordability requirements for developments that benefit greatly from these changes.
1:15:22
And crucially, and put from the residents of the surrounding community.
1:15:25
Now, I wanna share some late breaking news.
1:15:28
Yesterday morning, Manhattan's Burrow Board voted to approve 15 of the key recommendations in this proposal, including nearly all the recommendations that directly impact Manhattan.
1:15:41
This represents a major change of unprecedented in the history of Burrow Board votes on major zoning changes over recent decades.
1:15:51
And I think it shows broad based support in an era of desperate affordability challenges.
1:15:59
Amidst the urgent need to help catalyze the production of what potentially could be 100,000 new units unleashed by the passage of this proposal.
1:16:09
So for all these reasons to reiterate, I have submitted my recommendation for yes with conditions, and I urge the c CPC to approve this package and to to approve this package and to approve it even further.
1:16:23
Thank you so much.
1:16:24
Back to you, Mister Chip.
Dan Garodnick
1:16:25
Thank you.
1:16:25
Thank you very much.
1:16:27
Barah President, Levine, and thank you for your incredible leadership on this issue.
1:16:33
And thank you for sharing with all of us the late breaking news.
1:16:38
Of the Manhattan Burrow Board's recommendation.
1:16:41
So thank you.
1:16:41
We really appreciate you joining us here today.
Emanuel Kokinakis
1:16:43
Thank you, sir.
1:16:44
Thank you.
Dan Garodnick
1:16:44
Oh, wait.

Subscribe to the citymeetings.nyc newsletter

Highlights of meeting moments and curious claims every 1-2 weeks.

Read previous issues

Citymeetings.nyc pigeon logo

Is citymeetings.nyc useful to you?

I'm thrilled!

Please help me out by answering just one question.

What do you do?

Thank you!

Want to stay up to date? Sign up for the newsletter.