Micah Hunter from NHP Foundation on City of Yes for Housing Opportunity and its impact on affordable housing crisis
6:20:37
·
3 min
Micah Hunter, a project manager at NHP Foundation and former HPD and ACS employee, testifies in support of the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity proposal. He shares personal experiences and professional insights on the urgent need for affordable housing in New York City, highlighting the positive impacts on families and communities.
- Emphasizes the housing crisis in NYC, citing statistics on housing unit shortages compared to household growth
- Discusses the changing demographics affecting housing needs, including baby boomers and workforce housing demands
- Urges the Commission to vote in support of the proposal, stating it will help build a city that meets all residents' needs
- Personal experience of having to leave Bed-Stuy due to rising costs
- Housing crisis and need for more affordable housing
- Discrepancy between household growth and new housing units in NYC
- Positive impact of affordable housing on families
- Changing demographics affecting housing needs (e.g., baby boomers, workforce housing)
- City of Yes for Housing Opportunity proposal as a step to address housing issues
[EXPERIMENTAL]
Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?
I was not able to tie quotes from the testimony back to specific elements of the proposal. Check out another testimony here.
About this analysis:
This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.
All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.
You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.
When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.
But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.
In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.