Pascale Leone, Executive Director of the Supportive Housing Network of New York, on City of Yes for Housing Opportunity and its impact on supportive housing
8:42:15
·
3 min
Pascale Leone expresses support for the City of Yes initiative while highlighting concerns about potential unintended consequences for supportive housing providers. Leone emphasizes the importance of supportive housing in combating chronic homelessness and calls for modifications to protect existing units and the ability to build more supportive housing.
- Strongly favors the Universal Affordability Preference (UAP) for providing more floor area ratio bonuses to build more supportive housing
- Expresses concern about the loss of off-site options for generating certificates or bonuses, which have been crucial for nonprofit providers
- Requests permanent ability to sell existing air rights and consideration for supportive housing filed as use group 2 or 3
- Supportive housing is effective in combating chronic homelessness and providing critical services
- Supportive housing increases property values of neighboring buildings
- The network supports the goals of City of Yes with some conditions
- Concerned about the removal of off-site options for generating certificates or bonuses
- Request for zoning text language to make existing air rights certificates permanent
- Concerned about potential loss of value for existing certificates under proposed text
- Request for zoning text to embrace supportive housing equally when filed as use group 2 or 3
- Supportive of City of Yes goals but believes modest amendments are needed to protect existing units and ability to build more supportive housing
[EXPERIMENTAL]
Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?
- UAP
The following are AI-extracted quotes and reasoning about which elements of the proposal were discussed in this testimony.
This is a quick, close approximation. Occasionally, the connection between a testimony's transcript and specific elements of City Planning's proposal is tenuous.
Read about this AI-generated analysis here.
UAP
"We are strongly in favor of the UAP that will provide more floor area ratio bonuses build more buildings and more supportive housing."
This quote directly mentions UAP (Universal Affordability Preference) and indicates support for it, showing that the speaker is discussing this element of the proposal.
About this analysis:
This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.
All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.
You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.
When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.
But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.
In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.