Sachi Takahashi-Rial, Board Member of Open New York and Manhattan Community Board 5, on support for City of Yes for Housing Opportunity initiative and its impact on New York City's housing crisis
11:25:57
·
171 sec
Sachi Takahashi-Rial, speaking as an individual, strongly supports the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity initiative as a critical solution to New York City's housing crisis. She draws on her experience living in San Francisco to highlight the severity of New York's housing shortage, noting that New York has issued fewer housing units per capita than most other large cities, including San Francisco.
- Particularly endorses the Universal Affordability Preference for creating permanent affordable housing and the office-to-residential conversion policy, especially beneficial for areas like Midtown
- Supports the flexible transfer of air rights for landmarks as a smart policy that balances historic preservation with community needs
- Argues that these policies will make New York City more accessible and inclusive while maintaining its status as a world-class city
- New York City is issuing fewer housing units per capita than other large cities, including San Francisco
- Support for the entire City of Yes for Housing Opportunity policy package
- Particular support for the universal affordability preference
- Support for allowing office to residential conversion, especially beneficial for Midtown
- Support for more flexible transfer of air rights for landmarks
- The policy changes will make New York City more accessible and inclusive
[EXPERIMENTAL]
Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?
- UAP
- Residential Conversions
- Campuses
The following are AI-extracted quotes and reasoning about which elements of the proposal were discussed in this testimony.
This is a quick, close approximation. Occasionally, the connection between a testimony's transcript and specific elements of City Planning's proposal is tenuous.
Read about this AI-generated analysis here.
UAP
"I support the entire policy package in the city of yes for housing opportunity. And in particular, the universal affordability preference since it creates permanent affordable housing and works hand in hand with state tax breaks to bring more housing and especially more affordable housing to our community."
The speaker explicitly mentions and supports the Universal Affordability Preference, highlighting its benefits in creating affordable housing.
Residential Conversions
"I also especially support allowing office to residential conversion. I spend most of my time in Midtown, which is an area that would really benefit from having this option."
The speaker explicitly mentions and supports office to residential conversions, which is a key component of the Residential Conversions element of the proposal.
"Again, this policy works hand in hand with the state's program to pay for affordable housing in office to residential conversion. So the city should pass these zoning changes so that we can take advantage of these benefits and get new affordable housing in our community."
The speaker further elaborates on the benefits of office to residential conversions, tying it to affordable housing creation, which aligns with the Residential Conversions element of the proposal.
Campuses
"The last piece that that all emphasizes that the I think the policy for landmarks to be able to transfer air rights more flexibly is also really smart. It's a best practice that marries the goals of historic preservation with the evolving needs of a community and the evolving financial needs of our historic institutions, giving them that option."
While the speaker doesn't explicitly mention 'campuses', they discuss the policy of transferring air rights more flexibly for landmarks and historic institutions, which aligns with the Campuses element of the proposal that aims to make it easier for campuses to add new buildings and use their space more effectively.
About this analysis:
This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.
All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.
You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.
When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.
But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.
In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.