Stan Liao, a long-time New York resident, expresses strong support for the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity initiative without any amendments. He emphasizes the urgent need to address the city's housing crisis and high rent costs.

• Liao cites personal experiences of friends moving away due to expensive rent
• He endorses the City Department of Building Services (CDBS) plan
• Liao looks forward to more affordable housing being built in New York City

• Strongly supports the City of Yes with no amendments
• Long-time New York resident
• Rent is extremely expensive in the city
• Friends are moving away due to high costs
• City is in an immense housing crisis
• Urgently need to build more housing of all kinds
• Supports CDBS plan
• Looks forward to more affordable housing being built

[EXPERIMENTAL]

Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?

I was not able to tie quotes from the testimony back to specific elements of the proposal. Check out another testimony here.

About this analysis:

This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.

All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.

You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.

When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.

But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.

In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.