Thomas Devaney from Municipal Art Society on City of Yes for Housing Opportunity zoning amendment
8:07:01
·
3 min
Thomas Devaney, Senior Director of Land Use Planning at the Municipal Art Society (MAS), expresses support for the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity zoning amendment. He views it as a good start to addressing New York City's housing crisis by unlocking the 'missing middle' in housing production through incremental citywide zoning changes.
- Devaney supports the plan's equitable distribution of housing density, including provisions for town centers, transit-oriented development, accessory dwelling units, and universal affordability preference.
- MAS recognizes the modest projections of the amendment, with an estimated 109,000 new housing units by 2039, of which only 20% would be affordable.
- Devaney emphasizes the need for a comprehensive approach that includes city and state incentives, funding tools, and infrastructure support to fully address the housing crisis.
- City of Yes for Housing Opportunity is a good start to address the housing crisis
- The plan aims to unlock the 'missing middle' in housing typologies
- Supports equitable distribution of housing density across the city
- Supports transit-oriented development, accessory dwelling units, and universal affordability preference
- Supports office-to-residential conversions and elimination of parking requirements
- Projections for new housing units are modest (109,000 by 2039)
- Zoning is just one tool; a comprehensive approach is needed
- The city must ensure social and physical infrastructure meets neighborhood needs with increased density
- MAS will provide further comments on campus infill, community engagement, and heat island impacts
[EXPERIMENTAL]
Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?
- UAP
- Residential Conversions
- Town Center Zoning
- Parking Mandates
- ADU
- Transit-Oriented Development
- Campuses
The following are AI-extracted quotes and reasoning about which elements of the proposal were discussed in this testimony.
This is a quick, close approximation. Occasionally, the connection between a testimony's transcript and specific elements of City Planning's proposal is tenuous.
Read about this AI-generated analysis here.
UAP
"We've been encouraged to see tile centers zoning, transit oriented development, provisions for excess accessory dwelling units, universal affordability preference, including the proposal."
The speaker directly mentions 'universal affordability preference' as one of the elements they are encouraged to see in the proposal.
Residential Conversions
"We also support incentives for office to residential conversions"
The speaker explicitly mentions support for office to residential conversions, which is a key aspect of the Residential Conversions element of the proposal.
Town Center Zoning
"We've been encouraged to see tile centers zoning, transit oriented development, provisions for excess accessory dwelling units, universal affordability preference, including the proposal."
The speaker mentions 'tile centers zoning' which is likely a misspelling or transcription error for 'town center zoning', indicating that this element is discussed and supported.
Parking Mandates
"We also support incentives for office to residential conversions and the elimination of parking requirements and expanding transfer of landlord development rights."
The speaker explicitly mentions support for 'elimination of parking requirements', which directly relates to the Removing Parking Mandates element of the proposal.
ADU
"We've been encouraged to see tile centers zoning, transit oriented development, provisions for excess accessory dwelling units, universal affordability preference, including the proposal."
The speaker directly mentions 'provisions for excess accessory dwelling units' as one of the elements they are encouraged to see in the proposal, which refers to the Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) element.
Transit-Oriented Development
"We've been encouraged to see tile centers zoning, transit oriented development, provisions for excess accessory dwelling units, universal affordability preference, including the proposal."
The speaker explicitly mentions 'transit oriented development' as one of the elements they are encouraged to see in the proposal.
Campuses
"We will be providing long written comments that will explore using campus infill to produce more portable housing, ways to engage NIGHT YOUR RESIDENTS ON PLANNING AND DESIGN AND ALSO ADDRESS HEAT ISLAND IMPACT."
The speaker mentions that they will be providing comments on 'using campus infill to produce more portable housing', which relates to the Campuses element of the proposal.
About this analysis:
This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.
All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.
You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.
When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.
But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.
In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.