The citymeetings.nyc logo showing a pigeon at a podium with a microphone.

citymeetings.nyc

Your guide to NYC's public proceedings.

TESTIMONY

Vanessa Gibson, Bronx Borough President, on City of Yes for Housing Opportunity zoning proposal

3:11:21

·

8 min

Report an issue

Vanessa Gibson, Bronx Borough President, offers her perspective on the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity proposal. She supports most aspects of the plan with conditions, emphasizing the need for affordable housing and balanced development across all New York City neighborhoods.

  • Gibson supports proposals for town center zoning, transit-oriented development, and the legalization of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), but calls for increased Department of Buildings inspectors to ensure safety.
  • She opposes the removal of parking mandates, particularly in transit-poor areas of the Bronx, and does not support increasing small and shared housing units at the expense of family-sized apartments.
  • Gibson stresses the importance of community engagement, preserving neighborhood character, and ensuring access to city services for all residents.
  • Supports most of the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity proposal with conditions
  • Emphasizes the need for affordable housing and homeownership opportunities
  • Supports creating more housing in every neighborhood across all 59 community boards
  • Advocates for maintaining neighborhood character and investing in existing communities
  • Supports legalizing ADUs but calls for increased inspections and community engagement
  • Supports infill development on NYCHA campuses with focus on housing for working-class families and seniors
  • Opposes decreasing the dwelling unit factor and increasing small and shared housing
  • Advocates for more 2 and 3 bedroom apartments for families
  • Opposes removal of parking mandates, especially in transit-poor areas of the Bronx
  • Commends efforts to streamline zoning regulations but emphasizes need for careful implementation

[EXPERIMENTAL]

Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?

  • Town Center Zoning
  • Parking Mandates
  • ADU
  • Transit-Oriented Development
  • Campuses
  • Small and Shared Housing

The following are AI-extracted quotes and reasoning about which elements of the proposal were discussed in this testimony.

This is a quick, close approximation. Occasionally, the connection between a testimony's transcript and specific elements of City Planning's proposal is tenuous.

Read about this AI-generated analysis here.

Town Center Zoning

"The town center is owning, transit orient, to development and district fixes, those proposals will add slightly more density while limiting any maximum height increases to moderate density areas."

This quote directly mentions 'town center zoning' as part of the proposals being discussed, indicating that the speaker is addressing this element of the City of Yes For Housing Opportunity proposal.

Parking Mandates

"In addition, I also do not support the removal of parking mandates. No surprise there. I'll tell you why. This proposal may work in many high density areas with significant access to transit, but simply put, it does not work in many neighborhoods in the Bronx."

This quote directly addresses the proposal to remove parking mandates, which is a key element of the City of Yes For Housing Opportunity plan. The speaker expresses her opposition to this element, particularly for areas in the Bronx with limited transit access.

"There's already significant parking competition in many of these same neighborhoods, and they believe that it would get much worse without mandates. We can highly suggest, but without a mandate, developers are not going to build parking because it's costly and because they don't always find that people utilize it."

This quote further elaborates on the speaker's concerns about removing parking mandates, highlighting the potential negative impacts on neighborhoods with existing parking issues and the likelihood that developers would not voluntarily include parking without mandates.

ADU

"I am absolutely in favor of the proposal to legalize the development of ADUs. However, I wanna note that there is a significant concern with this proposal that I raised to all of you today because allowing this new unit type in our city absolutely must come with an increase in the amount of inspectors at the Department of Buildings, DOB, to protect residents, safety, and their overall well-being."

This quote directly addresses the proposal to legalize Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), which is a key element of the City of Yes For Housing Opportunity plan. The speaker expresses support for this element while also raising concerns about implementation and safety.

Transit-Oriented Development

"The town center is owning, transit orient, to development and district fixes, those proposals will add slightly more density while limiting any maximum height increases to moderate density areas. By focusing on areas within a half mile of transit, We can ensure that everyone can truly get around the Bronx and the Sea without adding more cars to our already congested streets."

This quote directly mentions 'transit orient[ed] development' as part of the proposals being discussed. The speaker also elaborates on the benefits of focusing development near transit, which is a key aspect of transit-oriented development.

Campuses

"When it comes to the infill development proposal, particularly on night shift campuses, the city must actively engage with residents and tenant association leadership. To ensure that their concerns are taken into account, infill development should have a focus on providing housing for working class families, older adults, and particularly those that already live in Nitro."

This quote discusses infill development on NYCHA campuses, which aligns with the Campuses element of the City of Yes For Housing Opportunity proposal. The speaker emphasizes the need for community engagement and prioritizing housing for existing residents and working-class families.

"We've seen through the prior administration in the Bronx. We have Millbrook Terrace. We have the development on the Morris 2 development project that's happening as well as Casa Salina that was open a few weeks ago on the Sultamayur campus. So we've already seen what we can do when we work with nonprofits, and we build senior housing on underutilized night shift land."

This quote provides examples of existing campus developments in the Bronx, demonstrating that the speaker is familiar with and discussing the concept of utilizing campus spaces for housing development, which is part of the Campuses element of the proposal.

Small and Shared Housing

"I do not support the proposal to increase small and shared housing and to decrease the Duf. The dwelling unit factor, and let me explain why. The Bronx is already seeing an influx of smaller and smaller and smaller units and many of these new development projects."

This quote directly addresses the proposal to increase small and shared housing, which is a key element of the City of Yes For Housing Opportunity plan. The speaker expresses opposition to this element, citing concerns about the proliferation of smaller units in the Bronx.

"And throughout my tenure as borrower president, you all know, I've consistently advocated for building more units that have 2 and 3 bedroom apartments. We need larger units that work for families, not just single adults."

This quote further elaborates on the speaker's opposition to the small and shared housing proposal, emphasizing the need for larger family-sized units instead of smaller units targeted at single adults.


About this analysis:

This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.

All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.

You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.

When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.

But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.

In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.

↗ Why are there transcription and diarization errors?
Vanessa Gibson
3:11:21
Thank you, Mister Chair.
3:11:22
Good afternoon, everyone.
3:11:23
Thank you to our chair, Dan Gorodnik, and the commissioners Achesity Planning Commission.
3:11:29
I thank you all for convening this very important hearing this afternoon.
3:11:35
And thank you for your team and the hard work that everyone has really done to assemble the city of yes and really bring this important proposal forward.
3:11:43
I know you've heard a lot of testimony from my colleagues in government and advocates and New Yorkers and not for prophets.
3:11:49
So I just wanted to offer you my thoughts as president of the Great Burrow of the Bronx, as it relates to the city of yes for housing opportunities.
3:11:59
Our city is currently experiencing a housing crisis known to many, and this has been going on for quite some time.
3:12:06
Too many of our residents are not able to afford their current rents and are at risk of evictions and displacements.
3:12:14
Simply put, the rent is too high.
3:12:16
And many families in the Bronx are rent burden, spending more than 30% of their income towards rent.
3:12:23
The construction of new housing over time unfortunately has not kept pace with rising rents for many residents have reached at a 4 unaffordable levels.
3:12:35
The zoning for housing opportunity proposal Being discussed this afternoon starts our city on an important path forward to creating the affordable housing and homeownership opportunities that are necessary to bring down the cost of rent throughout the Bronx and the city of New York.
3:12:53
In my full recommendations, which I did submit, On Monday of this week, I supported most of the proposal with conditions as you all know.
3:13:03
However, there were some proposals within this text that I do not support and others that I believe require greater thought if they are to be implemented.
3:13:13
I fully support the goal of creating a little more housing in every neighborhood, all 59 community boards in our city.
3:13:22
All communities in our city must do their fair share to really create the housing that we truly need.
3:13:28
However, the building of new developments must be done While we maintain a balance and we invest in the existing neighborhoods, we preserve the character and uniqueness of many of our neighborhoods and consulting with current residents to ensure that all residents and families have access to city services that they need and truly deserve.
3:13:49
I believe that this is a balanced approach to housing development, and we should try to achieve that as much as possible.
3:13:57
The proposals that will result in a minor increase in housing and low density neighborhoods that are largely modest and will result in a few extra units at most on each lot.
3:14:08
The town center is owning, transit orient, to development and district fixes, those proposals will add slightly more density while limiting any maximum height increases to moderate density areas.
3:14:22
By focusing on areas within a half mile of transit, We can ensure that everyone can truly get around the Bronx and the Sea without adding more cars to our already congested streets.
3:14:34
I am absolutely in favor of the proposal to legalize the development of ADUs.
3:14:39
However, I wanna note that there is a significant concern with this proposal that I raised to all of you today because allowing this new unit type in our city absolutely must come with an increase in the amount of inspectors at the Department of Buildings, DOB, to protect residents, safety, and their overall well-being.
3:15:02
The city must engage with the community more on this issue and ensure that all homeowners know their rights know the guidelines, know the law, and the responsibilities that come when it comes to adding ADUs to their homes.
3:15:15
When it comes to the infill development proposal, particularly on night shift campuses, the city must actively engage with residents and tenant association leadership.
3:15:25
To ensure that their concerns are taken into account, infill development should have a focus on providing housing for working class families, older adults, and particularly those that already live in Nitro.
3:15:38
We've seen through the prior administration in the Bronx.
3:15:41
We have Millbrook Terrace.
3:15:43
We have the development on the Morris 2 development project that's happening as well as Casa Salina that was open a few weeks ago on the Sultamayur campus.
3:15:54
So we've already seen what we can do when we work with nonprofits, and we build senior housing on underutilized night shift land.
3:16:01
But I still think that we have to make sure that nighttime residents have access to light to air, green spaces, and open spaces just like every resident of our city.
3:16:11
I do not support the proposal to increase small and shared housing and to decrease the Duf.
3:16:18
The dwelling unit factor, and let me explain why.
3:16:21
The Bronx is already seeing an influx of smaller and smaller and smaller units and many of these new development projects.
3:16:29
And throughout my tenure as borrower president, you all know, I've consistently advocated for building more units that have 2 and 3 bedroom apartments.
3:16:38
We need larger units that work for families, not just single adults.
3:16:42
We have some projects that are still 421a, that are 7030, where we're catering to the young independent entrepreneurs.
3:16:50
The small business owners, the young professionals, the college grads who are here for school and work, and that's great.
3:16:56
But I don't wanna be saturated with housing that is not conducive to Bronx residents and families today.
3:17:03
So I understand that there is a need for this type of living arrangements for many single adults that don't want to live in an apartment by themselves and cannot afford it, but the Bronx sees many many units where families are now doubled and tripled up right now because they cannot afford the housing that's conducive to their household size.
3:17:23
In addition, I also do not support the removal of parking mandates.
3:17:28
No surprise there.
3:17:29
I'll tell you why.
3:17:30
This proposal may work in many high density areas with significant access to transit, but simply put, it does not work in many neighborhoods in the Bronx.
3:17:40
Particularly the East Bronx where we have transit deserts today.
3:17:44
There's no subway.
3:17:45
The the bus service is very slow and we need to improve that And the only way we take residents out of vehicles is if we make the alternative better.
3:17:54
And simply put that has not happened across the Bronx So with that, I definitely think that the parking provisions have to remain in areas where we do not have transit access.
3:18:06
Car ownership sometimes is the only practical way to get around and the only other way for people to connect and get to and from their destinations.
3:18:15
There's already significant parking competition in many of these same neighborhoods, and they believe that it would get much worse without mandates.
3:18:23
We can highly suggest, but without a mandate, developers are not going to build parking because it's costly and because they don't always find that people utilize it.
3:18:32
If this proposal were to move forward, it must be limited to the areas where there is no access to transit, I do wanna make sure that we do focus on that type of need for some of our residents in the Bronx.
3:18:46
So in conclusion, I do want to commend the Department of City Planning for your commitments to find in creative ways to streamline the current zoning regulations while maintaining our core intention to protect the public health, the public safety, and the general welfare of New Yorkers.
3:19:03
Urgently addressing outdated zoning ordinances is critical to tackling the affordable housing crisis that we have that is driving too many of our neighbors and New Yorkers out of their homes and in some cases out of the city entirely.
3:19:20
We are the Northernmost borough.
3:19:21
So if the Bronx residents get pushed out chair, we have nowhere to go.
3:19:25
Right?
3:19:26
And so I do wanna make sure that you all know I submitted my full recommendation this week, which discusses all the proposals in the entirety, as well as some of my recommendations for improvement And with that, I hope you will consider our recommendations.
3:19:39
And I do thank you so much for your time this afternoon.
3:19:42
Thank you, Chair of the Rocknick, and thank you to the commission.
3:19:46
We really appreciate your time today on behalf of the bookie Down Bronx.
3:19:49
Thank you.

Follow-up discussion/remarks

QUESTION

Chair Garodnick inquires about Bronx residents' housing expansion preferences

3:19:59

·

169 sec

Chair Dan Garodnick asks Bronx Borough President Vanessa Gibson about housing options Bronx residents might want to see for expanding their homes or making changes to their properties. Gibson responds by discussing the potential benefits and challenges of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) in the Bronx.

  • Gibson supports ADUs as a way to regulate and improve safety for existing unofficial home additions
  • She emphasizes the need for increased Department of Buildings staffing to ensure proper oversight and inspections
  • Gibson highlights that ADUs can help accommodate growing families, returning college graduates, and elderly relatives
  • Supports most of the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity proposal with conditions
  • Emphasizes the need for affordable housing and homeownership opportunities
  • Supports creating more housing in every neighborhood across all 59 community boards
  • Advocates for maintaining neighborhood character and investing in existing communities
  • Supports legalizing ADUs but calls for increased inspections and community engagement
  • Supports infill development on NYCHA campuses with focus on housing for working-class families and seniors
  • Opposes decreasing the dwelling unit factor and increasing small and shared housing
  • Advocates for more 2 and 3 bedroom apartments for families
  • Opposes removal of parking mandates, especially in transit-poor areas of the Bronx
  • Commends efforts to streamline zoning regulations but emphasizes need for careful implementation

[EXPERIMENTAL]

Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?

  • Town Center Zoning
  • Parking Mandates
  • ADU
  • Transit-Oriented Development
  • Campuses
  • Small and Shared Housing

The following are AI-extracted quotes and reasoning about which elements of the proposal were discussed in this testimony.

This is a quick, close approximation. Occasionally, the connection between a testimony's transcript and specific elements of City Planning's proposal is tenuous.

Read about this AI-generated analysis here.

Town Center Zoning

"The town center is owning, transit orient, to development and district fixes, those proposals will add slightly more density while limiting any maximum height increases to moderate density areas."

This quote directly mentions 'town center zoning' as part of the proposals being discussed, indicating that the speaker is addressing this element of the City of Yes For Housing Opportunity proposal.

Parking Mandates

"In addition, I also do not support the removal of parking mandates. No surprise there. I'll tell you why. This proposal may work in many high density areas with significant access to transit, but simply put, it does not work in many neighborhoods in the Bronx."

This quote directly addresses the proposal to remove parking mandates, which is a key element of the City of Yes For Housing Opportunity plan. The speaker expresses her opposition to this element, particularly for areas in the Bronx with limited transit access.

"There's already significant parking competition in many of these same neighborhoods, and they believe that it would get much worse without mandates. We can highly suggest, but without a mandate, developers are not going to build parking because it's costly and because they don't always find that people utilize it."

This quote further elaborates on the speaker's concerns about removing parking mandates, highlighting the potential negative impacts on neighborhoods with existing parking issues and the likelihood that developers would not voluntarily include parking without mandates.

ADU

"I am absolutely in favor of the proposal to legalize the development of ADUs. However, I wanna note that there is a significant concern with this proposal that I raised to all of you today because allowing this new unit type in our city absolutely must come with an increase in the amount of inspectors at the Department of Buildings, DOB, to protect residents, safety, and their overall well-being."

This quote directly addresses the proposal to legalize Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), which is a key element of the City of Yes For Housing Opportunity plan. The speaker expresses support for this element while also raising concerns about implementation and safety.

Transit-Oriented Development

"The town center is owning, transit orient, to development and district fixes, those proposals will add slightly more density while limiting any maximum height increases to moderate density areas. By focusing on areas within a half mile of transit, We can ensure that everyone can truly get around the Bronx and the Sea without adding more cars to our already congested streets."

This quote directly mentions 'transit orient[ed] development' as part of the proposals being discussed. The speaker also elaborates on the benefits of focusing development near transit, which is a key aspect of transit-oriented development.

Campuses

"When it comes to the infill development proposal, particularly on night shift campuses, the city must actively engage with residents and tenant association leadership. To ensure that their concerns are taken into account, infill development should have a focus on providing housing for working class families, older adults, and particularly those that already live in Nitro."

This quote discusses infill development on NYCHA campuses, which aligns with the Campuses element of the City of Yes For Housing Opportunity proposal. The speaker emphasizes the need for community engagement and prioritizing housing for existing residents and working-class families.

"We've seen through the prior administration in the Bronx. We have Millbrook Terrace. We have the development on the Morris 2 development project that's happening as well as Casa Salina that was open a few weeks ago on the Sultamayur campus. So we've already seen what we can do when we work with nonprofits, and we build senior housing on underutilized night shift land."

This quote provides examples of existing campus developments in the Bronx, demonstrating that the speaker is familiar with and discussing the concept of utilizing campus spaces for housing development, which is part of the Campuses element of the proposal.

Small and Shared Housing

"I do not support the proposal to increase small and shared housing and to decrease the Duf. The dwelling unit factor, and let me explain why. The Bronx is already seeing an influx of smaller and smaller and smaller units and many of these new development projects."

This quote directly addresses the proposal to increase small and shared housing, which is a key element of the City of Yes For Housing Opportunity plan. The speaker expresses opposition to this element, citing concerns about the proliferation of smaller units in the Bronx.

"And throughout my tenure as borrower president, you all know, I've consistently advocated for building more units that have 2 and 3 bedroom apartments. We need larger units that work for families, not just single adults."

This quote further elaborates on the speaker's opposition to the small and shared housing proposal, emphasizing the need for larger family-sized units instead of smaller units targeted at single adults.


About this analysis:

This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.

All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.

You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.

When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.

But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.

In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.

↗ Why are there transcription and diarization errors?
Dan Garodnick
3:19:59
I I only have one one question for you.
3:20:02
Maybe if you can expand a little bit on what sort of housing options that Bronx residents might want to see to expand their own homes or to do changes on their own properties.
3:20:17
What sort of things do you think would be most useful or appropriate there?
Vanessa Gibson
3:20:22
Right.
3:20:22
So I think when you talk about the ADUs, the reality is is we have many homeowners that have added extensions and additions to their homes today.
3:20:31
And so part of my logic and reason in supporting the ADU component is because we have a system right now that that is not regulated.
3:20:40
And I want to make the system better and streamline and more structured so that there is a process where we have better oversight.
3:20:47
What we've seen in the Bronx chair has been far too many dangerous and unsafe housing conditions that unfortunately have caused fires and collapses because of the poor quality, because there's no oversight system.
3:21:03
So with the ADUs, I think many homeowners are looking for the addition because their families are growing.
3:21:09
They have college graduates that are moving back home.
3:21:12
They have older adults, grandparents that they're now taken care of as a primary caretaker, and they simply need space.
3:21:19
But we also need to make sure that, you know, homeowners do have that latitude, but it's also monitored in a way where we can ensure that it's done with quality and it's done with oversight because we have seen far too many cases in the city and in the Bronx where some add it in addition, whether it's a garage or conversion in their home, their backyard, their driveway, And then it's led to dangerous conditions that not just impact that individual homeowner, but your neighbor is on the block.
3:21:51
And so I see this as an opportunity to regulate a system that has not been regulated.
3:21:56
But as I mentioned, I do do encourage the commission to please ensure that there is sufficient staff to follow.
3:22:05
Because if we are pushing this city of yes through, with the current staffing levels at DOB, we're going to have a real challenge.
3:22:13
And I hear from many homeowners a lot, and sometimes the permitting system takes too long, the inspection process takes too long, and simply put homeowners don't have time to wait.
3:22:24
So if if we don't follow suit and come out and do the proper inspections and approve permits.
3:22:30
Guess what homeowners would do, what they do, and they will follow this process whether we like it or not.
3:22:37
And that leads to hazardous and dangerous conditions.
3:22:40
So I would rather have a system that's more regulated than a system that's not regulated where people are allowed to do what they want with no oversight.
QUESTION

Commissioner Benjamin inquires about transit-oriented development in the Bronx

3:22:56

·

131 sec

Commissioner Gail Benjamin asks Bronx Borough President Vanessa Gibson about the possibility of implementing a more tailored transit-oriented development (TOD) approach in areas of the Bronx with limited public transportation options. Gibson responds by discussing the potential impact of upcoming Metro North stations and the need to balance development with parking concerns in transit-poor neighborhoods.

  • Gibson supports a modified TOD approach that considers areas within half a mile of Metro North stations or subway lines
  • She highlights the importance of maintaining parking mandates in areas defined as 'transit deserts,' more than half a mile from local subways
  • The Borough President emphasizes the need to balance future transit improvements with the current reliance on cars in certain Bronx neighborhoods
  • Supports most of the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity proposal with conditions
  • Emphasizes the need for affordable housing and homeownership opportunities
  • Supports creating more housing in every neighborhood across all 59 community boards
  • Advocates for maintaining neighborhood character and investing in existing communities
  • Supports legalizing ADUs but calls for increased inspections and community engagement
  • Supports infill development on NYCHA campuses with focus on housing for working-class families and seniors
  • Opposes decreasing the dwelling unit factor and increasing small and shared housing
  • Advocates for more 2 and 3 bedroom apartments for families
  • Opposes removal of parking mandates, especially in transit-poor areas of the Bronx
  • Commends efforts to streamline zoning regulations but emphasizes need for careful implementation

[EXPERIMENTAL]

Which elements of City of Yes for Housing Opportunity were discussed in this testimony?

  • Town Center Zoning
  • Parking Mandates
  • ADU
  • Transit-Oriented Development
  • Campuses
  • Small and Shared Housing

The following are AI-extracted quotes and reasoning about which elements of the proposal were discussed in this testimony.

This is a quick, close approximation. Occasionally, the connection between a testimony's transcript and specific elements of City Planning's proposal is tenuous.

Read about this AI-generated analysis here.

Town Center Zoning

"The town center is owning, transit orient, to development and district fixes, those proposals will add slightly more density while limiting any maximum height increases to moderate density areas."

This quote directly mentions 'town center zoning' as part of the proposals being discussed, indicating that the speaker is addressing this element of the City of Yes For Housing Opportunity proposal.

Parking Mandates

"In addition, I also do not support the removal of parking mandates. No surprise there. I'll tell you why. This proposal may work in many high density areas with significant access to transit, but simply put, it does not work in many neighborhoods in the Bronx."

This quote directly addresses the proposal to remove parking mandates, which is a key element of the City of Yes For Housing Opportunity plan. The speaker expresses her opposition to this element, particularly for areas in the Bronx with limited transit access.

"There's already significant parking competition in many of these same neighborhoods, and they believe that it would get much worse without mandates. We can highly suggest, but without a mandate, developers are not going to build parking because it's costly and because they don't always find that people utilize it."

This quote further elaborates on the speaker's concerns about removing parking mandates, highlighting the potential negative impacts on neighborhoods with existing parking issues and the likelihood that developers would not voluntarily include parking without mandates.

ADU

"I am absolutely in favor of the proposal to legalize the development of ADUs. However, I wanna note that there is a significant concern with this proposal that I raised to all of you today because allowing this new unit type in our city absolutely must come with an increase in the amount of inspectors at the Department of Buildings, DOB, to protect residents, safety, and their overall well-being."

This quote directly addresses the proposal to legalize Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), which is a key element of the City of Yes For Housing Opportunity plan. The speaker expresses support for this element while also raising concerns about implementation and safety.

Transit-Oriented Development

"The town center is owning, transit orient, to development and district fixes, those proposals will add slightly more density while limiting any maximum height increases to moderate density areas. By focusing on areas within a half mile of transit, We can ensure that everyone can truly get around the Bronx and the Sea without adding more cars to our already congested streets."

This quote directly mentions 'transit orient[ed] development' as part of the proposals being discussed. The speaker also elaborates on the benefits of focusing development near transit, which is a key aspect of transit-oriented development.

Campuses

"When it comes to the infill development proposal, particularly on night shift campuses, the city must actively engage with residents and tenant association leadership. To ensure that their concerns are taken into account, infill development should have a focus on providing housing for working class families, older adults, and particularly those that already live in Nitro."

This quote discusses infill development on NYCHA campuses, which aligns with the Campuses element of the City of Yes For Housing Opportunity proposal. The speaker emphasizes the need for community engagement and prioritizing housing for existing residents and working-class families.

"We've seen through the prior administration in the Bronx. We have Millbrook Terrace. We have the development on the Morris 2 development project that's happening as well as Casa Salina that was open a few weeks ago on the Sultamayur campus. So we've already seen what we can do when we work with nonprofits, and we build senior housing on underutilized night shift land."

This quote provides examples of existing campus developments in the Bronx, demonstrating that the speaker is familiar with and discussing the concept of utilizing campus spaces for housing development, which is part of the Campuses element of the proposal.

Small and Shared Housing

"I do not support the proposal to increase small and shared housing and to decrease the Duf. The dwelling unit factor, and let me explain why. The Bronx is already seeing an influx of smaller and smaller and smaller units and many of these new development projects."

This quote directly addresses the proposal to increase small and shared housing, which is a key element of the City of Yes For Housing Opportunity plan. The speaker expresses opposition to this element, citing concerns about the proliferation of smaller units in the Bronx.

"And throughout my tenure as borrower president, you all know, I've consistently advocated for building more units that have 2 and 3 bedroom apartments. We need larger units that work for families, not just single adults."

This quote further elaborates on the speaker's opposition to the small and shared housing proposal, emphasizing the need for larger family-sized units instead of smaller units targeted at single adults.


About this analysis:

This analysis is done by AI that reasons whether or not a quote from the testimony discusses a particular element of the proposal.

All the prompts and data are open and available on Github.

You can search for testimonies that mentioned a specific element in the table on the main meeting page.

When an element is explicitly stated in the testimony (e.g. "Universal Affordability Preference" or "UAP"), the analysis is accurate.

But the connection between a quote from the testimony and an element of the proposal is sometimes implicit.

In these cases, the AI might eagerly label a testimony as discussing a proposal when the connection is tenuous, or it might omit it entirely.

↗ Why are there transcription and diarization errors?
Alicia Boyd
3:22:56
I just had a question with when
Gail Benjamin
3:22:59
you were talking about the East Bronx and other areas in the Bronx, let's say, like, Riverdale that may be more of transit deserts.
3:23:07
But maybe within half a mile walk of a Metro North station or of the number 1.
3:23:16
Would you favor some way of having a more a narrower or a more regulated kind of DOD approach that would take account of those kinds of situations?
Vanessa Gibson
3:23:35
Yes.
3:23:36
Absolutely.
3:23:36
And I think for us in the Bronx with the expected Metro North proposal with access to Penn Station that's currently before the New York City Council.
3:23:45
We have a real opportunity in Collop City Section 5.
3:23:49
In Hunt's point, in Morris Park, and Parkchester Van Ness.
3:23:53
But then I also think about parts of Thrones Neck where a country club where you have a lot of 1 and 2 and 3 family homes, low density districts, and a lot of car owners.
3:24:04
And so many of them will come to us at the community board and really express a lot of concern about not having access to parking, not wanting to come out of their vehicles, But then I think also with the shared streets concept that we're trying to make sure that this is a process where everyone shares in our streets, with the eruption of e bikes and e scooters and bike lanes.
3:24:27
I mean, it's really, really put a strain on the parking off street that is available.
3:24:32
And so what we are advocating for in our recommendations are for those areas specifically that we define as a transit desert that is more than that half mile outside of the local subway we believe that the parking mandate should remain in place.
3:24:47
And again, this is something that I think we are looking at future wise, with the Metro North Coming, but also knowing that even with 4 new Metro North stations in the East Bronx, we still will have neighborhoods that we are defining as transit doesn't.
Gail Benjamin
3:25:04
Thank you very much.
3:25:05
I really appreciate that.
Vanessa Gibson
3:25:06
Thank you.
3:25:07
Thank you, commissioner.

Subscribe to the citymeetings.nyc newsletter

Highlights of meeting moments and curious claims every 1-2 weeks.

Read previous issues

Citymeetings.nyc pigeon logo

Is citymeetings.nyc useful to you?

I'm thrilled!

Please help me out by answering just one question.

What do you do?

Thank you!

Want to stay up to date? Sign up for the newsletter.