Your guide to NYC's public proceedings.
Q&A
Proposal for new CPC rule on UDAAP applications
0:40:43
·
68 sec
Council Member Brannan proposes a potential CPC rule requiring UDAAP applications to include comprehensive project summaries before certification or approval. Commissioner Rampershad responds cautiously to this suggestion.
- Brannan suggests that UDAAP applications should not be certified as complete or approved without a project summary containing all statutorily allowed information.
- Rampershad expresses hesitancy in directly proposing such a rule, deferring to elected officials for shaping or modifying regulations.
- While acknowledging the importance of transparency and public feedback, Rampershad stops short of fully endorsing the proposed rule, indicating he would need further discussion on the matter.
Justin Brannan
0:40:43
would you propose a c a CPC rule that the UdAP applications will not be certified as complete or improved unless they are accompanied by a a project summary that includes all the info that the Udev statue allows us to
Oudeshram “Raj” Rampershad
0:40:57
well, I know I know if I should speak on that.
0:40:59
I would probably leave it up to the the electors to help shape or or modify.
0:41:04
Do you
Justin Brannan
0:41:04
think it's a good idea?
Oudeshram “Raj” Rampershad
0:41:06
I I I think it's something I could be looked at.
0:41:08
I mean, you should be looked at.
0:41:10
I don't know if I should I I believe in full transparency with that, and I always believe in, you know, getting it out to the public and getting feedback.
0:41:21
And that it shouldn't just be one, you know, one uniform, like, one one agency saying, yes.
0:41:27
This is it.
0:41:27
Don't you know?
Justin Brannan
0:41:29
But is that is that a rule that you would propose?
Oudeshram “Raj” Rampershad
0:41:32
I me, I wouldn't it
Justin Brannan
0:41:33
wouldn't it wouldn't be we don't have the you so CPC would
Oudeshram “Raj” Rampershad
0:41:36
I you know, it was something I would definitely have a discussion with and tell them.
0:41:39
Right?
0:41:39
I think it's something that should be looked at.
0:41:41
I mean, I I I can get back to you and give you specifics, but, you know, this Okay.
0:41:51
Suggestion.