John Ketchum
0:52:06
Thank you for the question.
0:52:07
So some jurisdictions allow for a three word descriptor of what the candidate stands for.
0:52:16
It doesn't necessarily have to be a party label per se, and that has led to some confusion by, for example, saying that the candidate was an independent candidate, right, which does not necessarily mean in a particular independent party or independence party.
0:52:34
I think the most important thing is that voters should have immediate information available to them on the ballots that they can make informed decisions on the spot.
0:52:43
We would all love to imagine that voters do ample homework before they get to the ballot box.
0:52:51
Many do, but some don't.
0:52:53
And we have to, in a sense, meet voters where they are in in those cases, and informational cues simply, provide either good or bad information.
0:53:03
And sometimes, if it's not aligned with, for example, what party leaders really want, then the voter may not know whether there's a real affinity or link between the party structure, the party leadership, and and the the particular candidate who's running.
0:53:23
So in order to strengthen that linkage and prevent potential misapprehensions or confusions, I think it would be important for party leadership to have some role in the endorsement that in in is included on the ballot.
0:53:39
And I welcome your second question.