Sergio De La Pava
3:38:31
Well, I assume the POST Act is being complied with, but at its core, we just don't know what we don't know.
3:38:37
The perfect example of this was a criminal case that had discovery statute in effect, and so we know some.
3:38:43
But they it seems to me from the that they preferred dismissal to having to talk about how exactly it came to center on on our client.
3:38:51
And and that's what we find a lot.
3:38:53
For example, the testimony this morning, like, facial recognition is only used to build up probable cause.
3:39:00
That's because if they said facial recognition was the reason for probable cause, for example, at a pretrial suppression hearing where there's testimony under oath, they would have to detail in, you know, under oath what exact what steps were used by a facial recognition.
3:39:15
So it's they they want credit for saying that they're not using it for probable cause, but it's everything else.
3:39:19
It's an end run around disclosure.
3:39:21
It's a way of them not having to talk about how they do facial recognition.
3:39:25
One of the things we know is that, you know, Photoshop is being used, and, ultimately, there's a great potential there for abuse.
3:39:34
It's not, I think, one of the it's not a situation where compute a computer has taken the element of error out on the contrary, and we see that with the data showing that it has racial bias built into it.
