Your guide to NYC's public proceedings.
Kirk Goodrich explains how ULURP and member deference deter housing development in resistant neighborhoods
0:45:46
·
3 min
Commissioner Leila Bozorg asks developer Kirk Goodrich how the land use process, particularly ULURP and member deference, affects which projects even get proposed, highlighting the hidden opportunity cost.
Goodrich explains that developers often won't even attempt projects in neighborhoods known for strong opposition and likely council member resistance, regardless of land availability, due to the high risk, time, and cost involved.
This self-censorship funnels development towards "paths of least resistance," often in lower-income communities, exacerbating fair housing issues and ultimately proving unsustainable.
- The current land use process, especially member deference, leads developers to avoid proposing projects in certain boroughs or neighborhoods known for opposition.
- This represents a significant, unquantifiable loss of potential housing development (opportunity cost).
- This avoidance concentrates development in fewer, often lower-income, areas, raising fair housing concerns and straining those communities' capacity.
- Goodrich argues this dynamic necessitates dramatic changes to the land use approval system.