TESTIMONY
Testimony: Elizabeth, Lobbyist, Testifies on Shoreline Docking Concerns
2:57:40
·
3 min
Elizabeth, a lobbyist from Brooklyn, shares her concerns about the impact of shoreline docking plans on Redhook's prorated cropland, the emission of toxins, and the potential damage to the shoreline and ocean. She highlights the financial and environmental impracticalities of the current plans, questioning the feasibility of funding and timeline inconsistencies. Elizabeth advocates for alternative investments in nonprofit corporations to reduce city deficit and improve legal compliance with existing laws protecting the shoreline.
Speaker 12
2:57:40
Hello.
2:57:41
My name is Elizabeth.
2:57:42
I'm a lobbyist based in Brooklyn.
2:57:45
I just wanted to thank you for allowing me to speak with the council with regards to this matter of the shoreline docking.
2:57:52
The redundancy of the fill in planning of the Shoreline pasture and pees on 975,000 acres of prorated crop land in Redhook by the seated pestilence is actually pushing the trash inwards towards the shore and is replacing the heat.
2:58:09
It relinquishes 45,000 tons of neuropathic prejunctivates by partitioning the procholic isle to produce heat, at 350,000 tarotsmithic toons of power.
2:58:21
It's enough to blast the hole all the way through New York Park.
2:58:24
Just an engine, one malfunction in weather, can do that.
2:58:30
The force would push the shoreline 100,000 feet down, 20 feet, and and 350,000 milnics of waste at into the ocean.
2:58:39
Installation takes 8 years at and the neuron pushing priority dictates and rule dates that the funds we submitted to deficit reduction for capital investment, I do.
2:58:49
I don't see how you can have a fitting put in place that takes about 8 years long, but have the funding documented on traffic by June.
2:58:59
It it it really doesn't make sense to me.
2:59:01
But with all due respect to the council, it will be better to it would better serve the council to invest in nonprofit corporations and proponents to reduce the city deficit by 3,000,000,000,000,000 to avoid Poland to my Congress.
2:59:13
As an alternative of Ilnick Parasit Court with a pordid ionic docking sphere with belt gates.
2:59:21
As it added, the New York Pellet Fund test rates 4000 investments per year in Bypass as for parallel docking desk it's that's the right it's more of a function than a shoreline, poor plug in.
2:59:33
The grounds of the shoreline the grounds of the trail line used for docking and designated as crop line in 1967.
2:59:40
Excuse me.
2:59:41
Sorry.
2:59:42
The grounds of the shoreline were used for and were occupied and were designated as cropland in 1967 and protected and are protected under the pillots law.
2:59:54
And, yes, investors share and this is necessary in order to collinate and land and land a profitable profitability rate of 13% in marketing.
3:00:04
Meaning you need to invest any disfracture in corporation, in currency of leisure cropping as credit pilot law in order to make it legal to put a fill in a pump with infinite column of the shoreline.
3:00:18
The reason this is the case is because if you put a pump where the shoreline dropper system is gonna go it's it's supposed to not going to.
3:00:26
It will drain down into the street and fool it by the next storm or the next foreign economic icing, which means, let's say, we have another messenger of very cold weather from space, which happens about every 16 a half months where we drive starting to 40 degrees.
3:00:43
It will Your
Speaker 0
3:00:43
time has expired.
Speaker 1
3:00:48
Thank you for your testimony.
3:00:50
Please make sure you email in anything additional that you were unable to say today.
3:00:55
Thank you so much.
3:00:57
And for being so patient.
3:01:00
Yeah.
3:01:00
And thank you.
Speaker 3
3:01:01
Yeah.
Speaker 1
3:01:01
I'd now like to call up Christopher Leon Johnson.
Speaker 4
3:01:04
Yeah.
Speaker 1
3:01:04
We're in public to money.
Speaker 21
3:01:06
Alright.
3:01:06
Ready?
3:01:08
Ready.
3:01:08
Hi.
3:01:09
Hi.