Q&A
Clarification on ADU regulations and building code concerns
0:14:51
·
47 sec
Council Member Keith Powers seeks clarification on Commissioner Raj Rampershad's stance on Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). Rampershad elaborates on his concerns, focusing on the need for clear building codes and safety regulations.
- Rampershad suggests removing detached ADUs from the proposal
- He emphasizes the need for clear state regulations and building codes for ADU implementation
- The commissioner raises concerns about fire safety, sprinkler systems, and sewer connections for ADUs
- Rampershad highlights the potential high costs for homeowners to meet safety requirements
Keith Powers
0:14:51
Understood.
0:14:51
Understood.
0:14:52
And just to clarify, you said that you think the ADU the detached ADUs should be removed and potentially keep in the ones where you are con doing the number.
Oudeshram “Raj” Rampershad
0:15:00
I think they need to be clear with the code, with state regulations are gonna be implemented.
0:15:05
They I mean, we we have to worry about you're in a inside of fire district.
0:15:10
You know, a lot have 3 story wood frame, which means if that's the case, then what's gonna happen?
0:15:15
The owner has the sprinkler their house.
0:15:17
Sprinklers can close-up to $30, $40.
0:15:19
Depends on what you have to do because you may have to bring in a new line coming in.
0:15:23
That was the issue with also the ADUs.
0:15:25
How's the sewer connection gonna happen?
0:15:27
Are you connecting through the house?
0:15:28
Where's the code?
0:15:29
Where's the section of the law that says you can do that?
0:15:32
I was also worried about the fire department regulations on this.
0:15:35
I know they said they had a lot of meetings, but I don't know.
Keith Powers
0:15:38
Can can I ask you a follow-up question?
