Q&A
Discussion on false convictions and arrests related to surveillance technology
1:40:02
·
34 sec
Council Member Cabán questions Deputy Commissioner Gerber about false convictions resulting from facial recognition technology. Gerber states he is unaware of any such cases, but Cabán emphasizes the distinction between false convictions and false arrests or false positives.
- Gerber claims no knowledge of false convictions from facial recognition technology
- Cabán highlights that false arrests and false positives, while not resulting in convictions, are still harmful
- The exchange underscores the potential risks associated with surveillance technology use in law enforcement
Tiffany Cabán
1:40:02
Now, I I believe you also testified that there has not been a false conviction based on the use of this this technology.
1:40:11
Correct?
Michael Gerber
1:40:11
I am not aware Okay.
1:40:13
Of a false conviction that resulted from our use of facial recognition technology.
Tiffany Cabán
1:40:18
That's just No, you're not aware.
1:40:19
I just want to note that a false conviction is not the same as a false arrest or a false positive and those two things are actually really really harmful things distinction is important.
1:40:30
Thank you for answering that question.
1:40:34
If Okay.
1:40:36
So in relation to documenting and preserving discovery materials related to the the drone as a first responder program.