Your guide to NYC's public proceedings.
Discussing the political feasibility of ULURP reform and the housing emergency
0:38:26
·
5 min
Commissioner Kathryn Wylde questions the political feasibility of charter changes that might reduce the power of community boards or the City Council in land use, given that member deference is a political practice, not a legal mandate.
Developer Kirk Goodrich argues the low vacancy rate constitutes an emergency that should trigger expedited processes, bypassing lengthy debates that delay needed housing for years.
Former Council Member Marjorie Velasquez concurs that the current process is too long and complex, advocating for reforms that empower council members to make decisions based on broad community needs rather than succumbing to pressure from vocal minorities early in the process.
- The discussion centers on whether charter changes can effectively curb political practices like member deference.
- Goodrich proposes emergency triggers (like the vacancy rate) that could allow for faster, potentially unilateral, action on housing.
- He criticizes lengthy deliberations (citing 6-15 year examples) as morally unacceptable when people are suffering.
- Velasquez highlights the burden on council members under member deference, often forcing votes without full project understanding.
- Both suggest reforming the process itself to prioritize citywide needs and expedite housing production.